BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Divisibility

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jim@StratusPrep » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:27 pm
Statement 2 is not really a statement. Throw this question out.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Join the discussion

by TheGmatTutor » Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:45 pm
In statement 2 I think he's trying to say that N*M is divisible by 40. If that's right, here's my interpretation:

1) Only proves N has 5 as a factor, insufficient
2) Proves N*M has 40 as a factor, therefore it has 3 2's and a 5. If it has 3 2's, then it must be divisible by 8, so sufficient

Answer: B
If this post was helpful, please click the "Thanks" button.
Join the discussion