BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mc Graw Hill T-3 CR1

Expert replies

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:58 pm
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest evidence that the company should not follow the consultant’s advice?

the question is which is the point for which we should not follow the consultants's advise

E states that "Shipping the cough syrup bottles without the measuring cups will provide a marginal improvement in the number of cough syrup bottles that can be shipped in a standard package".

which means we will follow the consultants advise. hence E is incorrect.

Now correct answer is A.

if we sell syrup without cup then consumers consume either less dose or overdose.

less dose:- Not effective lost their faith in that company and next time they wont buy
overdose:- Dangerous hence again consumer lost their faith and never purchase this syrup

when measuring cap is provided then consumers cannt complain for overdose or less syrup and more effective will be the medicine hence sells will increase.


So i am 100 % sure answer is A

Join the discussion

by pnk » Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:39 am
neha.patni wrote:A brand of cough syrup comes with a measuring cup attached so that customers can measure the proper dosage. A consultant has pointed out that this cup is unnecessary, since most customers have measuring cups at home. Since the cups increase the cost of packaging the cough syrup and reduce the total number of units that can be shipped in a standard package, the consultant advises that the company can increase its net revenue on this product (total revenue minus total costs) by selling the cough syrup without the measuring cups.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest evidence that the company should not follow the consultant's advice?

A. Studies have shown that customers who use cough syrup without a measuring cup frequently take either too little or too much of the medicine, rendering the dosage either ineffective or, in cases of overdose, dangerous.
E. Shipping the cough syrup bottles without the measuring cups will provide a marginal improvement in the number of
cough syrup bottles that can be shipped in a standard package.
Key thing is argument says: Cups increase packaging cost & reduce quantiy of bottle shipped; Net revenue = total revenue - total cost.

Consultant assumes that without cup - either packaging cost will reduce or quantity of bottle being shipped will increase or both can happen. In any of these case, one of the three things can happen: total cost will reduce (when bottle without cup..reduces packaging cost) or total revenue will increase (nos of bottle shipped increase), or both can happen. In E - total revenue is not going to increase as nos of bottle remained that the same level...but it does not mean total cost will not reduce. Without cup..total cost will surely reduce, therefore net revenue will increase. E Strengthens

In A - customer may presume that syrup is ineffective....that can reduce the sale leading to lower total revenue. Nos of bottle being sold decrease, means total revenue decreases. Also total cost will also drop, but certainly it will not compensate for loss in revenue from dropped sales. Therefore net revenue will drop. IMO A
Join the discussion