-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
How to Tackle Every Single GMAT Problem (Seriously!) - Part 4
Welcome to the fourth installment of our series: how to tackle every problem on the GMAT. If youre joining in the middle, go back and learn about the set of principles that tie together everything we need to do on the GMAT. Then work your way back to this installment.
Heres our framework again:
I finished off part 3 with the following GMATPrep problem from the free exams. Lets use the SC process to answer it now.
The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.(A) merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
(B) as merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from examining tools found in Germany, which include
(C) as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes
(D) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
(E) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
Ready?
Glance: What have we got?
than merely
Im wondering what the than is a part of, so my eye goes a little further back:
rather than merely
Oohcomparison! What about the beginning of the answers?
(A) merely scavenging(B) as merely scavenging
(C) as mere meat scavengers,
(D) mere scavengers
(E) mere scavengers
All right, weve got an X rather than Y comparison structure. Were going to have to figure out what the X is and that will indicate what form we need to choose for the Y. (You may decide to jot down X rather than Y to remind yourself to address this issue.)
Time to Read the sentence! Whats it saying?
The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.
Strip that down to the core:
The new image of (some) people as X, rather than Y, have emerged from the examination (of tools).
What do you notice?
Wait a sec: theres an error in the core sentence! You can choose to stick with the original comparison issue, or you can switch gears and Work on the subject-verb issue first. Im going to do the latter:
The new image have emerged.
No way! Image is singular, so it should say the new image has emerged. Say goodbye to answers (A) and (B).
Answers (C) through (E) are all okay on this point, so now loop back around. Luckily, weve already identified the second potential issue: that comparison.
The new image of (some) people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than Y, have emerged from the examination (of tools).
X is hunters (of large animals), so Y should be in the same noun form. Hmm. This is another reason to get rid of (A) and (B), but (C) through (E) all use the proper match, scavengers.
Aside: Im not thrilled with mere meat scavengers in (C). Id prefer mere scavengers of meat, as in (D) and (E). But there isnt a strong grammatical reason why I couldnt use mere meat scavengers, so Im going to ignore that and look for something else. Loop around again!
Now, when youre down to a small number of choices, compare the remaining answers, looking for differences. There are a couple, but theyre all actually part of a big modifier, so I recommend looking at them as one big chunk:
(C) from examining tools found in Germany that includes(D) from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
(E) from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
The three structures at the end are used for three types of modifiers.
That includes, in (C), signals an essential noun modifier: the modifier must be included in the sentence or the basic meaning of the core sentence will be nonsensical.
Further, the noun should be as close as possible to the modifier. In this case, the noun Germany is right before the comma. Logically, the modifier should refer to tools. In certain circumstances, it is possible to have a short separation of the noun and the modifierbut is it okay in this case to say that the that includes modifier refers back to tools, with a short found in Germany modifier in between?
Try it out:
from the examination of tools that includes
Oops. No, its not possible in this case because tools is plural and includes is singular. Logically, the modifier points to tools, but structurally it points to the singular Germany (or maybe even the singular examination?). None of these works; eliminate (C).
Can you use the same reasoning to eliminate either (D) or (E)?
Yes! Answer (D) changes the modifier to the non-essential structure comma which includes, and this modifier has the same problem: includes would have to be plural in order to point to tools. Eliminate (D).
But wait a second. Answer (E) doesnt seem to be doing what its supposed to be doing either. It uses a comma ing modifier:
The new image of (some) people as X, rather than Y, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including (some spears).
A comma ing modifier refers back to the entire preceding clause, but is it really the case that the three spears refer back to the image has emerged from the examination?
Weve just uncovered one of the few exceptions to the general comma ing rule: when using the word including, the sentence really can just be giving examples of something (usually a noun) that was named shortly before the comma. Unlike the modifiers in answers (C) and (D), the including modifier in (E) does not contain a verb that needs to match the noun tools, so there are no problems with the construction.
All right, are you ready to try out the GRW process on Critical Reasoning?
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authoritys plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the effectiveness of the authoritys plan to finance the proposed improvements by increasing bridge tolls?
(A) Before the authority increases tolls on any of the area bridges, it is required by law to hold public hearings at which objections to the proposed increase can be raised.
(B) Whenever bridge tolls are increased, the authority must pay a private contractor to adjust the automated toll-collecting machines.
(C) Between the time a proposed toll increase is announced and the time the increase is actually put into effect, many commuters buy more tokens than usual to postpone the effects of the increase.
(D) When tolls were last increased on the two bridges in question, almost 20 percent of the regular commuter traffic switched to a slightly longer alternative route that has since been improved.
(E) The chairman of the authority is a member of the Tristate Automobile Club that has registered strong opposition to the proposed toll increase.
Try that problem out and well talk about it next time!
Key Takeaways for Every Problem You Will Ever Do:
(1) First, see whether a quick look can give you an early idea of what the question may be testing. On SC, glance at the word right before the underline and at the first word of the underline: any clue markers there? Next, compare the first word or two of each answer choice: do the differences signal any particular issues?
(2) Next, Reflect on what youve been given and Organize your thoughts. If youre lucky, youll spot more than one potential issue to tackle. In that case, pick the issue that you think is the easiest or most straightforward.
(3) When you know youve got an error, cross off that answer choice and any others that repeat the same error. Once youve finished dealing with the first potential issue, youll likely still have more than one answer left, so its very useful if you came up with two ideas to start. Now you know exactly what youre going to tackle next!
* GMATPrep questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.
Recent Articles
- Best MBA for Real Estate: Top Schools, Career Paths & How to Choose
- The Best MBA Programs for Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Do You Need a Finalized Test Score Before You Hire an MBA Admissions Consultant?
- Best MBA for Entrepreneurship: Top Programs for Founders, Startups & Family Business Owners
- Am I Too Young for a Top MBA Program? Or Too Old?
Archive
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009


