-
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Difficulty Levels on the GMAT
This week, we have a great article from guest author Ron Purewal, a Manhattan GMAT Instructor and one of my fellow moderators here at Beat The GMAT. Ron has some really interesting stuff for us on the difficulty levels of GMAT questions. Take it away, Ron!
Studying for the GMAT is a formidable undertaking. There are so many potential topics of study and so much study time to be allocated that it is often difficult, and may even seem impossible, to decide where to start or where to focus.
Still, there are some topics that are definitely less important than others and, in the case of most students, simply not important at all. Probably the most prominent of these topics, in the minds of students, is difficulty level.
On the GMAT forums, I see many posts inquiring about the specific, numerical difficulty level of problems. While these numbers if they can be nailed down at all are an interesting curiosity, they are essentially irrelevant to students strategy; the only people who benefit from knowing specific difficulty levels are people who write the exams.
In other words: Do NOT worry excessively about the difficulty level of the problems.
You should NEVER bother trying to assign specific numbers to the difficulty of a problem; the only levels of difficulty that will ever affect you are hard for me, easy for me, and just right for me.
In fact, you should never give much thought to the difficulty level of the problems no matter whether you are taking the actual exam or just studying. Heres why.
When you study, an excessive focus on difficulty level will cause you to abandon the big picture, causing you to focus excessively on specifics. Thats not a good thing, because the only true purpose of studying is to discover general principles and techniques that will solve not only the problem at hand, but also OTHER problems similar problems that may appear on future exams. (These general principles and techniques are what I have called takeaways on the forum and in classes.)
Heres why difficulty level doesnt really matter when you study: its quite possible to derive a takeaway from any easy problem, and then use it to solve a much more difficult problem in the future or vice versa. Therefore, it is imperative that you study all problems within your grasp with the same intensity, without worrying about difficulty level; you never know which problems will give you the takeaways that you will need on your official test.
Then, theres the matter of taking the actual exam. In this circumstance, its also not worthwhile to worry about the difficulty level of problems because you will be completely unable to judge it with any accuracy. Therefore, if you even let your thoughts wander to difficulty level, not only will you be engaging in a completely unproductive thought process, but you will also be diverting mental energy away from the much more important task of answering the questions themselves!
Instead, your single most important mission during the official exam is to MONOTASK i.e., to think about nothing other than the objective content of the problem in front of you, and the techniques that will solve that problem. Outside concepts such as difficulty level should not even enter your mind while you take the official test; theyll do nothing but raise your stress level.
Is it ever appropriate to think about difficulty level?
About specific difficulty level trying to nail it down to the nearest hundred?
NO.
Never.
However, if you are studying from a source that is roughly ordered by difficulty such as the Official Guide quant section then it may be helpful to have a very general, very vague sense of the difficulty of the problems youre working on. In particular, if everything in a given section just seems too hard, then move back a bit; if everything seems a bit too easy, then move forward.
This is pretty much the only situation in which the notion of difficulty level will help you. And note that its still not helping you solve the problems its just helping you decide which problems to study in the first place. Thats not something that will transfer onto the official test.
Remember monotask!
So why does MGMAT tell us so much about the testing algorithm?
Mainly, we give you this information in order to justify our advice about time management and overall planning.
When we tell our students things such as NEVER spend too much time on one problem, inquisitive students will sometimes want to know why especially because this would be terrible advice on old-fashioned paper tests. This is the ONLY reason why we explain about adaptive algorithms and difficulty levels because its the machinery behind our advice.
In this respect, were not unlike a mechanic who might explain the workings of an anti-lock brake system to a curious customer. Is the customer ever really going to need to know how anti-lock brakes work? Of course not the customer just has to know how to use the anti-lock brakes, and in what ways they might differ from traditional brakes. The customer will never need any knowledge of the inner workings of the brake system (unless he/she plans to become a mechanic) but its the foundation of the functional knowledge that the customer does need.
Its the same with the adaptive algorithm and difficulty levels. Are you ever really going to need to know the nitty-gritty of how these work? Nope you just have to know how to manage your time and how to proceed through the questions, and in what ways this test might differ from traditional paper-based tests. You will never need any knowledge of precise difficulty levels, or of the precise workings of the adaptive algorithm (unless you plan to write tests yourself) but we present it to you, as full disclosure, because its the foundation of the functional knowledge that you will need.
Good luck!
Major take-aways from Rons article:
- When studying, its not productive to focus on the difficulty level of a problem. You can get just as much out of an easy for you problem as you can a hard for you problem. (In fact, I sometimes prove this to my students in class by showing them how much more they can learn from a problem that they all got right and that they all thought was really easy!)
- When taking the test, its detrimental to your performance to focus on the difficulty level of a problem. That brain power is brain power you could be using for the test; dont let yourself get distracted by something thats not useful. Besides, the actual test writers have to test these problems on thousands of students in order to determine the difficulty levels; were certainly not going to figure out the level just by looking at a problem for two minutes. :)
Recent Articles
- Best MBA for Real Estate: Top Schools, Career Paths & How to Choose
- The Best MBA Programs for Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Do You Need a Finalized Test Score Before You Hire an MBA Admissions Consultant?
- Best MBA for Entrepreneurship: Top Programs for Founders, Startups & Family Business Owners
- Am I Too Young for a Top MBA Program? Or Too Old?
Archive
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009