-
Target Test Prep 20% Off Flash Sale is on! Code: FLASH20
Redeem
“Layering” in Sentence Correction Questions
This week, we have another great article from Chris Ryan, Manhattan GMATs Director of Instructor and Product Development. Chris has some really interesting stuff for us this week on layering in Sentence Correction questions. Layering is a technique used by a test writer to make a question more difficult. Take it away, Chris!
We all know that the GMAT is a computer adaptive test, and computer adaptive tests give us questions based on the difficulty level that we earn as we take the test. How do the test writers at ACT (the organization that writes the GMAT; it used to be ETS, but ETS lost the contract to ACT 4-5 years ago; GMAC manages the algorithm and "owns" the test) determine which questions are harder than others?
First, ACT engages in a process called "normalization," wherein all freshly written questions are tested by actual test takers to determine what percentage answer the questions correctly (we know these questions as experimental questions). If too many people answer correctly, the question may need to be toughened up. If too few people answer correctly, the question may need to be dumbed down. ACT is looking to assemble a pool of questions that covers a range of difficulty, from cakewalk to mind-bending, and the test takers help them do so.
How does ACT find these test takers? Easy. Everyone who takes the GMAT will end up answering up to 10 unscored "experimental" math questions and 10 unscored "experimental" verbal questions. These questions are interspersed with the actual, scored questions with no way to identify them as experimental.
Second, the writers at ACT have a general sense of what makes a 50th percentile question, or a 75th percentile question, or a 90th percentile question. Because each test is designed to evaluate proficiency in the same range of topics, the writers have to come up with ways to test the same concepts at different levels of difficulty. Thats where layering comes in.
So, in a nutshell, a simple problem is made increasingly complex by adding information to obscure the core issues. In Sentence Correction questions, you are given a sentence in which a portion has been underlined. Your task is to determine whether the underlined portion is correct as it stands or whether it needs to be replaced with one of the answer choices in order to make the sentence grammatical and clear.
For example, let's consider the following sentence:
The dog are friendly.
It does not take much effort to see that this sentence is flawed: the noun ("dog") is singular but the verb ("are") is plural. This would be much too easy for the GMAT, so the test writers must camouflage the error. One simple way to do so is to insert a lot of unnecessary verbiage between the noun and verb. We call this verbiage the "middleman. For example:
The dog, which was one of two puppies rescued from the shelter, are friendly.
The subject-verb flaw is a little harder to see now, but still fairly apparent on a first read. If we take out the "middleman" (the intervening clause), we are back to the original sentence ("The dog are friendly"). Notice, however, that the writers have inserted a plural noun ("puppies") in the new clause so that you have plurality on the brain when you read "are friendly." If you are already thinking in plural terms, you are much less likely to spot the error. Even on a visual level, the subject of the sentence ("dog") is so far removed from the verb ("are") that the eye quickly alights on "puppies" as a possible subject for the plural "are. As tricky as this may already seem, the writers can put yet another kink in the rope:
Two puppies were rescued from the shelter, but neither of them are friendly.
The error in this sentence is significantly less apparent than those in the previous examples, though it is still the same error: subject-verb disagreement. Here the subject is "neither (of them)," which is singular (think of it as "neither one of them"). The verb, however, is still plural ("are"). The saga of the mismatched subject and verb goes on. Can the writers make the problem even harder to spot? Sure! Let's take a look at the following example:
Neither of the two puppies that were rescued from the shelter are friendly.
If you compare this sentence with the previous examples, the error is almost completely camouflaged. We can see that the subject is "neither (one)," which is singular, but the verb "are" is still plural. The core is simply neither (one) are friendly. The test writers have managed to layer enough junk into the middle of the sentence to make it very difficult to spot the error. That junk, though, is just extra information about the subject: Neither (one) are friendly. Only those who really know the rules backwards and forwards are going to be able to avoid this trap.
We have gone from "The dog are friendly" to "Neither of the two puppies that were rescued from the shelter are friendly" in a few steps, obscuring the central subject-verb issue along the way. Breaking sentences down into their component parts and analyzing their relationships is the key to success in Sentence Correction.
Major take-aways from Chriss article:
- When studying, try to figure out how the author layered the sentence to make it more difficult. Can you write a simpler version of the sentence (perhaps with only the core information, not everything)? How did the author make this sentence so tricky?
- If you can split out the core and understand how the different pieces of extra info fit into the core, then you wont be as likely to fall into a trap on a layered question. (You still might fall into a trap but you will have a much better chance of avoiding it!)
Recent Articles
Archive
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009