Clinical checkups

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:08 am
Thanked: 1 times

Clinical checkups

by smodak » Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:50 am
Clinical checkups after the first and second trimesters of pregnancy were introduced to Country X four years ago. Medical experts claim that the following reduction of 35% in cases of premature labor, one of the main causes of still birth in Country X, is directly connected to the aforementioned clinical checkups.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the medical experts' claim?

(A)The clinical checkups were intended for the early identification of women who are at risk of post-natal depression, and not for premature labor prevention.

(B)Four years ago, a dozen hospitals in Country X were given new equipment to facilitate the extraction of new-born babies, thus lowering significantly the number of still births.

(C)The cessation of hostilities in Country X coincided with the introduction of clinics offering checkups to pregnant women, and women in war zones are more prone to go into early labor.

(D)Eight years ago, the UN launched a campaign in Country X promoting the use of medicine to reduce the cases of infections of the urinary tract, following which the percentage of woman going into premature labor was reduced by 30%.

(E)Women throughout the world, including those in Country X, go into premature labor, inevitably resulting in a certain percentage of still births.

OA: C
Official Explanation: This answer choice provides an alternate explanation for the reduction phenomenon, thereby weakening the conclusion. According to this answer choice, the reduction of cases of premature labor may be explained by the cessation of hostilities rather than the checkups offered by clinics. This answer choice therefore shows that the checkups were not entirely responsible for the reduction.[/spoiler]
Last edited by smodak on Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:13 am
close call between B and D here.

In the argument there is a reduction in the percentage of premature labor as a result of which the number of still birth might have reduced.

B talks about still birth but not the cause that is premature labor.

D talks about the labor and the decrease in it because of the medicines.However, the percentage is lesser than that mentioned.

D takes the cake here.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:08 am
Thanked: 1 times

by smodak » Sun Jun 19, 2011 5:06 pm
OA Provided