How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. 5
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. 5
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

with Chris Peckover

with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
knight247 wrote:Lets assume there are N people
Out of these N ppl, the probability that any one of them was born in a leap year is 1/4
Probability that the same person is not born in a leap year is 1-1/4=3/4
So the probability that all N ppl are not born in a leap year is (3/4)^N
Now,
1-(3/4)^N is the probability that atleast one of them is born in a leap year.
It needs to be greater than 1/2 so we use the inequality
1-(3/4)^N>1/2
1/2>(3/4)^N
(3/4)^N<1/2
Now try plugging in different values of N from the answer options
(A)if N=1 then
3/4>1/2 so NO
(B)N=2
9/16>1/2 so NO
(C)N=3
27/64<1/2 so YES
(D)N=4
81/256<1/2 so YES
(E)N=5
243/1024<1/2 so YES
I guess the question should have asked what is the minimum number of ppl. The question doesn't seem to be properly worded. Anyway, if it is the minimum number of ppl then the answer is C
Hishankar.ashwin wrote:How many randomly assembled people are needed to have a better than 50% probability that at least 1 of them was born in a leap year?
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
E. 5
This is a common problem.shekhar.kataria wrote: I see many questions which i feel are beyond the scope of GMAT.
Agreed - the probability component of this question is within the scope of the GMAT.shankar.ashwin wrote:I got it in a practice test, but as Brent says maybe Leap Year questions may not appear in the GMAT, but that said the probability part of this question is pretty straightforward and IMO can be expected in the GMAT especially on high difficulty quants questions. I think experts would agree too.
New here Create free account