BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

average

Expert replies
by mariah » Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:46 pm
If the average (arithmetic mean) annual income for a group of people is x and the annual income of one of the members of the group, Joe, increases by 25%, how much does the average income of the whole group increase?

(A) There are 8 people in the group.
(B) The total initial income of the group is 9 times Joes initial income.

[spoiler]oa B[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:36 pm
mariah wrote:If the average (arithmetic mean) annual income for a group of people is x and the annual income of one of the members of the group, Joe, increases by 25%, how much does the average income of the whole group increase?

(A) There are 8 people in the group.
(B) The total initial income of the group is 9 times Joes initial income.
Hi!

We see we're being tested on averages, so let's start by jotting down the average formula:

average = (sum of terms)/(# of terms)

We know that the average is x and that the income of one person increases by 25%. We don't know the number of people in the group or the sum of their incomes.

On to the statements!

(1) # of terms = 8

We don't know how Joe relates to the rest of the group, so this doesn't help us, since we still don't know how much overall impact that 25% increase to Joe will have on the total sum: insufficient.

(2) thinking about the sum of the terms, we can determine that:

9J = J + everyone else

or

8J = sum of everyone except J

Knowing that J went up by 25%, we now know that

sum = 8J + 1.25J
sum = 9.25J

Since the sum went from 9J to 9.25J, we can calculate the % increase in the sum of the terms. However, without the number of terms or the original annual income, there's no way to determine the increase in the group average: insufficient.

We could also set up the following two equations:

x = 9J/#
x + .25J = (9.25)J/#

3 variables, 2 equations, no way to solve for any of the variables.

Together: with the number of people we can determine the percent increase in overall average, but there's no way to determine "how much" the average income of the whole group increases: insufficient, choose (E).

What's the source of this question? There are a number of problems with it:

1) nowhere does it say that the annual incomes of the rest of the group remain constant, and we can't make that assumption. If you notice that fact, you can automatically choose (E).

2) it asks for how much the average income increases, but nowhere is there an actual number. Here's a great tip for DS: if a question asks you to solve for an actual value, you need at least one actual value to solve (i.e. a percent or ratio won't cut it). If you notice that fact, you can automatically choose (E).

3 the OA is listed as (b), but even taking into account the flaws and rewriting the question, there's no way that (b) is sufficient alone.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by shayam » Tue Apr 26, 2011 5:03 pm
Tried to think in terms of equations.. which will result in avg2/avg1 = 10.25/9

my solving:

Avg1 = ( X+ J ) / n ... (1)
Avg2 = (X + J + 1.25 J ) / n ... (2)

1) Clearly insufficient.
2)X= 8J

Re-derive 1 & 2
Avg1 = ( 8J + J )/ n => 9J/n
Avg2 = ( 8J + J + 1.25 J) /n => 10.25J/n

Avg2/ Avg1 = 10.25/9
Avg2 = 10.25/9 * Avg1 => Avg1 + 0.13 Avg1 = 13 % increase..

if question is about percentage increase .. B is sufficient.

Combining 1,2 will be the same as above as 1 choice is irrelevant and it cancels out in equation.
Join the discussion