Is xy > ab ?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:51 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members

by Lifetron » Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:58 pm
Is it E ?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:08 pm
himu wrote:Is xy > ab ?

b/x > y/a

(ab)^2 >(xy)^2
As we know that signs of inequality changes depending upon the signs of the variables, we always need to check for both positive and negative scenarios while dealing with inequalities.

Consider the following two cases,
  • a = 1, b = 2, x = 1, y = 0 ---> xy < ab ---> NO
    a = 1, b = -2, x = -1, y = 0 ---> xy > ab ---> YES
The correct answer is E.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:13 am
himu wrote:Is xy > ab ?

b/x > y/a

(ab)^2 >(xy)^2
I received a PM asking me to explain why b/x > y/a does not imply that ab > xy.
The reason is that the signs of the denominators (a and x) are UNKNOWN.

To illustrate:
If a<0 and x>0, then ax<0.
Multiplying each side of an inequality by a negative value requires that the direction of the inequality change.
Thus, if each side of b/x > y/a is multiplied by ax<0 -- a NEGATIVE value -- then the direction of the inequality must CHANGE from > to <:
b/x > y/a
ax * (b/x) * x < ax * (y/a)
ab < xy.

Thus, b/x > y/a does not necessarily imply that ab > xy.
When the signs of the denominators are unknown, it is usually safer to plug in values.

Statement 1: b/x > y/a.
Case 1:
Try to plug in values so that xy≥0 and ab<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES: xy > ab.
If possible, plug in values that also satisfy statement 2.

If x=1 and y=1, and a=-2 and b=1, both statements are satisfied:
b/x > y/a --> 1/1 > 1/(-2)
(ab)² > (xy)² --> (-2*1)² > (1*1)².

In this case, xy>0 and ab<0, so xy > ab.

Case 2:
Try to plug in values so that xy<0 and ab≥0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO: xy < ab.
If possible, plug in values that also satisfy statement 2.

If x=1 and y=-1, and a=2 and b=1, both statements are satisfied:
b/x > y/a --> 1/1 > (-1)/2
(ab)² > (xy)² --> (2*1)² > (1 * (-1))².

In this case, xy<0 and ab>0, so xy < ab.

Since xy > ab in the first case and xy < ab in the second case, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:57 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members

by himu » Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:34 pm
Hi Anju & GMATGuru,

I understood where I was going wrong :)

thanks for helping me out !


Cheers,
~Himu.