-
vinni.k
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:620
Physician: In order to investigate diseases caused by hormonal imbalances, a certain researcher wants to study, among others, 200 children whose pituitary glands fail to produce typical amounts of Human Growth Hormone (HGH). The study would involve administering a synthetic version of HGH to the children over a two-year period. But medical research should be permitted only if it is likely to reveal important information about a medical condition and is known to pose only a minimal risk to the subjects. The researcher's proposed study should be prohibited.
Which one of the following, if true, would most help to justify the physician's argumentation?
(A) The resources expended on the HGH study could be spent instead on research likely to lead to treatments for medical conditions more serious than diseases stemming from hormonal imbalances.
(B) About 10,000 children have already been given synthetic HGH without obvious side effects.
(C) Obtaining informed consent from children is impossible, because they are not yet mature
(D) Although hormonal imbalances can cause disease, the imbalances themselves do not constitute a medical condition.
(E). The long-term effects of synthetic HGH have never been tested and are unknown.
OA is E
My first doubt - Is this paradox question or strengthen question ?
My second doubt - How can i eliminate D ? (A,B,C easy outs)
My analysis :- The physician says the researchers proposed study should be prohibited. The question is why the physician has this opinion. We have to answer this question.
Two conditions
(1) studies need to promise valuable information
(2) offer little patient risk.
Looks like strengthen if i see the argument in this way but after reading the question it seems to be paradox question type.
Looking forward to the replies
Which one of the following, if true, would most help to justify the physician's argumentation?
(A) The resources expended on the HGH study could be spent instead on research likely to lead to treatments for medical conditions more serious than diseases stemming from hormonal imbalances.
(B) About 10,000 children have already been given synthetic HGH without obvious side effects.
(C) Obtaining informed consent from children is impossible, because they are not yet mature
(D) Although hormonal imbalances can cause disease, the imbalances themselves do not constitute a medical condition.
(E). The long-term effects of synthetic HGH have never been tested and are unknown.
OA is E
My first doubt - Is this paradox question or strengthen question ?
My second doubt - How can i eliminate D ? (A,B,C easy outs)
My analysis :- The physician says the researchers proposed study should be prohibited. The question is why the physician has this opinion. We have to answer this question.
Two conditions
(1) studies need to promise valuable information
(2) offer little patient risk.
Looks like strengthen if i see the argument in this way but after reading the question it seems to be paradox question type.
Looking forward to the replies
