BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

FDP Problem

Expert replies
by yuvarajait » Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:57 pm
Question : Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for
the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of Revolutionary voters increased 10%, while
the number of Status Quo voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of
total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year?

The answer says 11/18. I couldn't catch the way its derived. Can someone help explaining this?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Night reader » Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:54 pm
increase in the number of total voters --> 1.08x
increase in the number voted for Revolutionary --> 1.1y
increase in the number voted for Status Quo --> 1.05z

Question: find Revolutionary/total voters?

solution: 1.08x=1.1y+1.05z; last year x=y+z; 1.08x=1.08y+1.08z OR 1.08y+1.08z=1.1y+1.05z <> 0.03z=0.02y OR 3z=2y, z=2y/3. Now rewriting x=y+z OR x=y+2y/3, x=5y/3 AND 1.1y/1.08x --> 1.1y : ((5y/3)*1.08)= 11y/10 : (5.4y/3)=
=(11y/10) * (3/5.4y)= 33y/54y= 11/18

yuvarajait wrote:Question : Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for
the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of Revolutionary voters increased 10%, while
the number of Status Quo voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of
total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year?

The answer says 11/18. I couldn't catch the way its derived. Can someone help explaining this?
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:06 pm
yuvarajait wrote:Question : Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for
the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of Revolutionary voters increased 10%, while
the number of Status Quo voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of
total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year?

The answer says 11/18. I couldn't catch the way its derived. Can someone help explaining this?

Solution:
Let the number of revolutionary voters be 'r' and the number of Status Quo voters be 's'.
So, increase in the number of revolutionary voters is (10/100) * r = 0.1r.
Increase in number of Status Quo voters is (5/100) * s = 0.05s.
This is equal to (8/100) * (r+s) = 0.08(r+s).
So, (10/100) * r + (5/100) * s = (8/100) * (r+s).
Or, 10r + 5s = 8r + 8s.
2r = 3s.
Or s/r = 2/3.
Or r/(r+s) = 3/5.
We need to know 1.1r/{1.08(r+s)} which is (110/108) * r/(r+s) = (110/108) * 3/5 = 11/18.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:38 pm
yuvarajait wrote:Question : Last year, all registered voters in Kumannia voted either for the Revolutionary Party or for
the Status Quo Party. This year, the number of Revolutionary voters increased 10%, while
the number of Status Quo voters increased 5%. No other votes were cast. If the number of
total voters increased 8%, what fraction of voters voted Revolutionary this year?

The answer says 11/18. I couldn't catch the way its derived. Can someone help explaining this?
This is a weighted average question.
Let R = Revolutionary voters and S = Status Quo voters.

A 10% increase in R is being combined with a 5% increase in S to yield a mixture with an increase of 8%.

We can use alligation, which dictates the following:

The proportion of each element in the mixture is equal to the distance between the percentage attributed to the other element in the mixture and the percentage attributed to the mixture.

Proportion of R = |percentage in S - percentage in mixture| = |5-8| = 3.
Proportion of S = |percentage in R - percentage in mixture| = |10-8| = 2.
Thus, last year R:S = 3:2.

To determine the ratio of R to S this year, we can plug in values for R and S.

Let R last year = 30 and S last year = 20.
R increased by 10% = (1.1)*30 = 33.
S increased by 5% = (1.05)*20 = 21.
R/(R+S) = 33/(33+21) = 33/54 = 11/18.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sat Aug 13, 2011 6:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by kamalakarthi » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:06 pm
Mitch,

Thanks for the great idea. However I am still not able to understand this..

The proportion needed of R (10%) = 8-5 = 3.
The proportion needed of S (5%) = 10-8 = 2.



How did u get 8-5 , and same for 10-8...Can you please help us understand this better. Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:27 am
kamalakarthi wrote:Mitch,

Thanks for the great idea. However I am still not able to understand this..

The proportion needed of R (10%) = 8-5 = 3.
The proportion needed of S (5%) = 10-8 = 2.



How did u get 8-5 , and same for 10-8...Can you please help us understand this better. Thanks in advance.
The process is called alligation.

When an entity that is X% (a higher percentage) is combined with an entity that is Y% (a lower percentage) to form a mixture that is Z%:

The proportion needed of the X% entity = Z-Y (the distance between the other 2 percentages).
The proportion needed of the Y% entity = X-Z (the distance between the other 2 percentages).

The resulting values give the ratio of X:Y in the mixture.

In the problem above:
R = 10% is combined with S = 5%.
The resulting mixture = 8%.

Thus:
The proportion of R in the population = the distance between 8% and S = 8-5 = 3.
The proportion of S in the population = the distance between R and 8% = 10-8 = 2.
Thus, the ratio of R:S in the population = 3:2.

Here are a few other problems in which I used alligation:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/allegation-t69552.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/problem-on-m ... 75453.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/percentage-p ... 70078.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by nadib002 » Fri May 06, 2011 7:36 am
@Mitch

I used the "alligation" method as well to set up the proportions.

I was stuck after 3:2

Following was my line of thinking:

3 parts voted for R and 2 parts voted for S

Therefore 3/5 * Total number of voters voted for R and 2/5 * Total number of voters voted for S

But we do-not know the Total number of voters. Can I pick a number, say 30 or 100, for the Total number of voters? For example if i were to pick 100, then 3/5 * 100 = 60 voted for R, but if i do it the way i mention i do not get the correct value.

What I do-not understand is when you picked 30 and 20 for R and S, why did you do the 10% and 5% increase again. Didn't the 3/5 represent the 10% increase already?

What is the flaw in my logic?

Could you please help?

Thank you
Join the discussion

by Tani » Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:03 pm
Intriguing. I used to do that intuitively but never knew it had a name! Thanks!
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion