BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality

Expert replies
by vinni.k » Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:34 am
Is 1 / a - b < b - a ?

(1) a < b
(2) 1 < |a - b|

Answer is A

Hi All,
I got the above question correct; but I am not sure whether my method to solve this question is correct or not. O.G explanation is little different. Please check my method.

1 / a - b < b - a
a - b > b - a

subtracting b from both sides
a - b - b > b - b - a
a - 2b > - a

subtracting a from both sides
a - a - 2b > -a - a
-2b > -2a

Dividing both sides by -2
b < a (flipping the inequality sign).

So, Is b < a ?

Option (1) says a < b that means b > a. (No but sufficient)

Option (2) 1 < | a - b |
Means, |a - b| > 1
Now, a -b > 1 and a - b < -1

For example, if a = 7 and b = 4 then 1/3 > -3, but if a = 4 and b = 7, then -1/3 < 3.
So, not sufficient

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by top_business_2011 » Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:23 am
vinni.k wrote:Is 1 / a - b < b - a ?

(1) a < b
(2) 1 < |a - b|

Answer is A

Hi All,
I got the above question correct; but I am not sure whether my method to solve this question is correct or not. O.G explanation is little different. Please check my method.

1 / a - b < b - a
a - b > b - a [ This doesn't logically follow from the above]

subtracting b from both sides
a - b - b > b - b - a
a - 2b > - a

subtracting a from both sides
a - a - 2b > -a - a
-2b > -2a

Dividing both sides by -2
b < a (flipping the inequality sign).

So, Is b < a ?

Option (1) says a < b that means b > a. (No but sufficient)[ It's to be 'YES!']

Option (2) 1 < | a - b |
Means, |a - b| > 1
Now, a -b > 1 and a - b < -1

For example, if a = 7 and b = 4 then 1/3 > -3, but if a = 4 and b = 7, then -1/3 < 3.
So, not sufficient

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Hi Vinni, For the most part, your solution is correct, except in the areas bold-faced.

The question is: Is 1/(a-b) < b-a? Here note that a-b is a negative of b-a.
To simplify our calculation, let's represent a-b by 'm'; hence, b-a shall be '-m'.

Now the question is: Is 1/m < -m?
Bring the variable on the right-hand side to the left.
= (1/m) + m <0
= (1 + m^2)/m < 0
We know for sure that the numerator is positive; therefore for the inequality to hold good, m has to be < 0.
So, simply the question is as follows: Is m<0? To make it relevant, let's undo our representation.
we used m to stand for a-b.
Therefore the question is as follows: Is a-b <0?
This means: Is a < b [By transferring -b to the right-hand side]
Statement 1: a < b.....Yes! So sufficient.
Statement 2: Similar to what you've done.

Hence the answer is A.
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:33 am
You can also do it by plugging in numbers:

1/(1-b) < b-a?

(1) a < b

We have 2 variables, hence create 3 versions of their relationship.
1. where they are both negative: a = -4 and b = -1
2. Where they are both positive: a = 1 and b = 2
3. Where one is positive and one is negative. a = -1 and b = 1

Now when you solve, you'll see that 1/(1-b) < b-a? holds true for all of the versions.

How do I know to create the 3 versions, when ever you see inequality signs comparing variables, usually negatives/positives and/or integers/non-integers are whats being tested.

(2) This doesn't tell us anything about each variable or their relationship. Simply gives us a range. range = multiple values, hence insufficient.

(a)
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by dabral » Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:58 pm
There are two ways this problem can be solved. Here is a video explanation.

https://www.gmatquantum.com/shared-posts ... ds120.html

Dabral
Free Video Explanations: 2021 GMAT OFFICIAL GUIDE.
Join the discussion

by vinni.k » Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:28 am
Thanks YAMLAKSIRA, Gurpinder, and dabral for checking my question. I should have plugged in the values to check whether 1/a - b is less than b - a. I was simply solving the question quickly and thought changing the reciprocal will change the inequality sign. I don't know where i got lost.

But thanks for giving the explanations. All the explanation really helped.

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Join the discussion

by SticklorForDetails » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:13 am
vinni.k wrote:Thanks YAMLAKSIRA, Gurpinder, and dabral for checking my question. I should have plugged in the values to check whether 1/a - b is less than b - a. I was simply solving the question quickly and thought changing the reciprocal will change the inequality sign. I don't know where i got lost.

But thanks for giving the explanations. All the explanation really helped.

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Taking the reciprocal of both sides usually does simply flip the inequality, which is what you did. However, it doesn't always work, most notably when one side is negative and the others side is positive (which, incidentally, is the case here):

-4 < 3 (clearly true)
-1/4 > 1/3 (clearly false)

The easiest pure-number-logic way to solve this problem is to realize that b-a and a-b are negatives of each other, and thus that if one is positive, the other is negative, depending simply on which is bigger, a or b. This is actually a really useful fact because something like "a-b" shows up quite often on the GMAT, and it's nice to know that a-b is ALWAYS positive for a>b and ALWAYS negative for b>a, regardless of the signs of the variables. Thus:

1 / a-b < b-a? If a>b, it's + < - (answer: no); if b>a, it's - < + (answer: yes).

(1) tells us straight off a<b, which we already know is Sufficient (answer: yes).
(2) has an absolute value around |a-b|, which we should quickly realize ignores which one is bigger; that is, since |a-b| = |b-a| (again, they're just negatives of one another), either case a>b or b>a could work equally here. Thus it's Insufficient.

This is really just a non-algebraic version of Yamlaksira's approach above, but because you're likely to see a-b and b-a in some form or another on test day, I think it's worth it to learn how they work so you can get directly and confidently to the answer on questions like this without risking algebraic mishap.
Experienced tutors, customized study plans, personalized service.

www.GothamTutors.com/adam.html
Join the discussion

by breakkgmat » Tue Jul 26, 2011 1:35 pm
I would with smart numbers instead of long equations.
St 1 says- a<b. So just pick a= 2 , b = 3.. So the equation says, 1/a-b < b-a so, 1/(2-3)<(3-2).So, --1<1 (Yes). Take any negative number, a=-3. b = -2. So,now 1/(-3+2)< -2+3. So, -1<1 Yes..
Both YES..SO A is sufficient.

St 2 says- 1 < |a - b| or |a-b| >1. So, a> 1+b OR -a+b>1 or b>a+1..Mixed answers...NOT SUF...

Ans-A
Join the discussion