BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

From Kaplan Book : Modifier 'that'

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:00 am

From Kaplan Book : Modifier 'that'

by satansanti » Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:07 am
This question is from Kaplan book.

Several consumer protection agencies have filed suit, seeking to bar distributors from advertising treatments for baldness that brings no discernible improvement and may even result in potential harm.



the answer of the question is

that bring no discernible improvement and may even prove harmful.

From Manhattan SC, this is wrong. Because we should use that to refer to the noun preceding it.

So I wonder whether we can use this sentence.

Thank you for your ans :)))
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:04 am
satansanti wrote:This question is from Kaplan book.

Several consumer protection agencies have filed suit, seeking to bar distributors from advertising treatments for baldness that brings no discernible improvement and may even result in potential harm.



the answer of the question is

that bring no discernible improvement and may even prove harmful.

From Manhattan SC, this is wrong. Because we should use that to refer to the noun preceding it.

So I wonder whether we can use this sentence.

Thank you for your ans :)))
A that-modifier does not have to touch what it modifies.
Our primary concern is CLARITY:
As long as the referent for the that-modifier is crystal clear, there can be a bit of distance between the that-modifier and its referent.
Several consumer protection agencies have filed suit, seeking to bar distributors from advertising TREATMENTS for baldness that BRING no discernible improvement.
Here, that bring (that + PLURAL VERB) clearly refers to treatments (the nearest preceding plural noun).
Since the referent for the that-modifier is crystal clear, the sentence is correct.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:00 am

by satansanti » Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:43 pm
Thank you very much

I have to be careful with each topic in SC. Because I read the content that contains 'which' modifier and I thought that for 'which' it is the same with 'that' in terms of position and how it refers to noun as modifier.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sun Jan 25, 2015 5:16 pm
Hi, Satansanti.

Another way to think about how 'that' functions in a sentence is to see that it can modify a noun or a noun phrase. For example, I can write "The bowl that is on the table seems to be broken." 'That' modifies the noun 'bowl.' So far so good. But I could toss in a prepositional modifier after bowl: "The bowl of bananas that is on the table seems to be broken." Now 'that' modifies a full noun phrase, "bowl of bananas." So, if you want, you can still think of 'that' as touching what it modifies. It's just touching a noun phrase instead of a noun in isolation. To put it more broadly, it's perfectly acceptable to have a construction like [Noun + Prepositional modifier] next to 'that.' The same would be true for 'which,' though 'which,' because it's non-restrictive, would follow a comma.

(To see this rule in action, check out #29 in the Official Guide.) https://gmatclub.com/forum/emily-dickins ... 10142.html
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1