Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:An easy way to solve this more quickly is to realize that any square we can find for one quadrant will have a a corresponding square for each other quadrant. If we focus only on squares that lie predominantly in quadrant 1, we can find 3:
1) (0,0) (10,0) (10,10) (0,10)
2) (0,0) (8,6) (2,14) (-6,8)
3) (0,0) (8,-6) (14,2) (6,8)
For each of these, we can mirror across the y-axis to find the corresponding squares for quadrant 2. We can mirror these new squares across the x-axis to find the squares for quadrant 3. Finally, we can mirror those squares across the y-axis to find the squares for quadrant 4. This gives us a total of 12, as we can see in GMATGuruNY's helpful diagram.
Hi Bill,
How do we figure out that (0,0) (8,6) (2,14) (-6,8) could be a possible square.
It is easy to see that the distance between (0,0) and (8,6) or (-6,8) is 10 but we will have to do sufficient maths to find that the 4th point of this square is (2,14). (2,14) will be the solution of 2 equations formed using the initial 3 points.
Regards,
Vishal