RC - Assumption

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

RC - Assumption

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:20 pm
In 1958, Jack Kilby invented the integrated circuit and ushered in the modern computer era. For the first time, using a semiconductor substrate, complete electronic circuits could be miniaturized and mass produced, ultimately leading to the advent of affordable consumer electronics. Unlike discrete circuits, integrated circuits contain a large number of transistors over a relatively small area. A greater number of transistors per circuit allows for faster processing speeds and more memory. Since the early 1960s, advances in photolithography and miniaturization have led to a doubling every two years in the number of transistors that can be cheaply placed on a single integrated circuit. In 1970, a typical integrated circuit could hold around two thousand transistors. In 2008, that number reached two billion. This consistent exponential increase in transistors per circuit and the consequent parallel improvement in computer processing speed and memory has been dubbed "Moore's Law" in honor of computer scientist Gordon Moore, the man who identified the trend.

Perhaps the most marvelous aspect of Moore's Law is its consistency. When Moore and other computer scientists identified the trend in 1965, they believed that the steady doubling of transistors per circuit could not continue much longer than roughly ten years. Instead, the pattern has continued through five decades. Though there have been a number of predictions as to when the trend will finally cease, a broad consensus among engineers and scientists asserts that the trends associated with Moore's Law will finally die out just before 2020. According to these same experts, by then transistors will have become so small as to begin approaching the size of atoms, and at that point will no longer be capable of processing basic logic functions integral to a computer's performance.

Nevertheless, there is reason to believe that Moore's Law may continue decades into the future. Futurist and computer scientist Ray Kurzweil points out that the most important trend identified by Moore's Law is not the increasing number of transistors per integrated circuit, but rather the exponential growth in computing power relative to cost. He argues that even if manufacturers reached a natural physical limit for miniaturized and parallel processing integrated circuits, new technologies, such as quantum computers, could maintain power-to-cost ratio aspect of Moore's Law. Given the number of unexpected new technological paradigms that have invalidated predictions of Moore's Law's demise since the 1960s, there is reason to support such a conclusion.


Ray Kurzweil's argument about the persistence of Moore's Law relies on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Quantum computer circuits can contain far more transistors than integrated circuits.

(B) It is possible for transistors miniaturized to the size of atoms to carry out basic logic functions.

(C) So long as computer engineers are able to continually miniaturize their technologies, there is no natural physical limit to Moore's Law.

(D) The technology that ultimately replaces the integrated circuit will similarly increase computing power at a predictable rate.

(E) The computer scientists and engineers who argue that Moore's Law will end before 2020 overestimate the rate of transistor miniaturization.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 214 times
Followed by:19 members
GMAT Score:740

by Birottam Dutta » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:16 pm
Ray Kurzweil's argument about the persistence of Moore's Law relies on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Quantum computer circuits can contain far more transistors than integrated circuits. --- this is a fact, not an assumption

(B) It is possible for transistors miniaturized to the size of atoms to carry out basic logic functions. ----- this is again not the assumption

(C) So long as computer engineers are able to continually miniaturize their technologies, there is no natural physical limit to Moore's Law. --- but beyond a certain point, physically manufacturing the item will be impossible, so incorrect.

(D) The technology that ultimately replaces the integrated circuit will similarly increase computing power at a predictable rate. --- this is true and basically the core assumption behind thinking that Moore's law will persist. That new technology will replace old and somehow accommodate further advancement of Moore's law

(E) The computer scientists and engineers who argue that Moore's Law will end before 2020 overestimate the rate of transistor --- incorrect.

Hence, D!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:41 pm
OA is D

Choice D is correct. Kurzweil's argument is made up of two crucial elements. The first is the idea that another technology can successfully replace the integrated circuit. The second is that the new technology will continue Moore's Law by continually improving computing power. This answer choice correctly identifies the second element of Kurzweil's argument.


Choice A is an unwarranted assumption. The passage tells us nothing about how quantum computers might extend Moore's Law, merely that they might. It may be that they will remove the need for transistors entirely, or tt may be some other method.

Choice B would support an argument for the continuation of Moore's Law after 2020, just not Kurzweil's. Remember, Kurzweil does not contest the limit on the miniaturization of transistors described by scientists and engineers in the second paragraph; he just believes that a new technology will replace integrated circuits.

Choice C can be a tempting answer choice because the second clause sounds like something Kurzweil might believe. Kurzweil believes that new technologies can replace the integrated circuit, and therefore it is also possible that he believes Moore's Law has no definite natural limit. The first clause is where the problem lies in this answer choice. Kurzweil's belief about the continuation of Moore's Law is not related to the ability of engineers to "continually miniaturize their technologies;" he is addressing another aspect of Moore's Law.

Choice E is not really related to Kurzweil's argument, though Kurzweil may agree with this statement. In the passage, Kurzweil does not dispute the "rate of miniaturization of transistors." Instead he argues that new technology will allow computer manufacturers to get around the limits imposed by transistor size.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---