BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

easy question that I don't have answer to.

Expert replies
by abcdefg » Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:20 am
Is x + y > 0 ?

(1) x - y > 0

(2) x^2 - y^2 > 0

[spoiler] Statement 2 I could easily answer by x^2 - y^2 => (x + y) (x - y).
So (x + y) ( x - y) > 0 which means either (x + y) is pos and (x - y) is pos, or (x + y) is neg AND (x - y) is neg. so insuff.

The original statement can be rephrased as "is x > -y?" and statement 1 can be rephrased as "x > y". But these 2 statements can't both be true so statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question. [/spoiler].

Am I right? Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

abcdefg wrote:Is x + y > 0 ?

(1) x - y > 0

(2) x^2 - y^2 > 0

[spoiler] Statement 2 I could easily answer by x^2 - y^2 => (x + y) (x - y).
So (x + y) ( x - y) > 0 which means either (x + y) is pos and (x - y) is pos, or (x + y) is neg AND (x - y) is neg. so insuff.

The original statement can be rephrased as "is x > -y?" and statement 1 can be rephrased as "x > y". But these 2 statements can't both be true so statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question. [/spoiler].

Am I right? Thanks.
Statement 1 only tells you that x is greater than y. But x can be -2 and y -3 so x+y=-5 or x can be 3 and y 2 and x+y = 5 insufficient.
Statement 2 says that x^2 is greater than y^2 but again X could be -3 and y -2 or x could be 3 and y 2=insufficient

C) if x is greater than y and if x^2 is greater than y^2 then both should be positive and their sum greater than cero
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:06 am
ABC,

you are on the right track, but making it more difficult than necessary.

Is x + y > 0?

A.) x - y > 0

Obviously insufficient. X = 4, Y = -5

B.) x^2 - y^2 > 0
Insufficient. X = -5, Y = 4

Both Together:
Factor x^2 - y^2 = (x+y)(x-y) > 0

Now since we know that x - y > 0, x + y MUST be > 0 because
positive*positive = positive

If x + y was negative, then (x-y)(x+y) would be negative, which violates the second constraint.

Takes a while to write out but problems like this can be done completely in your head to save time on Math section.
Join the discussion