Hi Tmoni26,
A combination of 'math skills' and TESTing VALUES can help you to quickly answer this question.
We're asked for the value of (T)(V)/W
Fact 1: 7T = 6W and V = 2W
IF....
W = 1
V = 2
T = 6/7
The answer to the question is (12/7)/1 = 12/7
IF....
W = 2
V = 4
T = 12/7
The answer to the question is (48/7)/2 = 48/14 = 3 6/14
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
Fact 2: T/W = 6/7 and V/2 = 14
Since T/W = 6/7, we can substitute THAT ratio directly into the question.
V/2 = 14
V = 28
The answer to the question is (6)(28)/7 and that is the ONLY possible answer.
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT.
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
The Princeton Review ----- Fractions/ Equations
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Hi Rich,
Thanks
I got it wrong because in Statement 1, I automatically changed 7t = 6w to t/w = 6/7 and thought i had sufficiency.
Thanks
I got it wrong because in Statement 1, I automatically changed 7t = 6w to t/w = 6/7 and thought i had sufficiency.
Hi Tmoni26,
There's nothing wrong with taking that approach with Fact 1, BUT you still have to account for the value of "V" also (which we're told is twice the value of "W"). As the value of W changes, the answer to the question changes.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
There's nothing wrong with taking that approach with Fact 1, BUT you still have to account for the value of "V" also (which we're told is twice the value of "W"). As the value of W changes, the answer to the question changes.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Hi Tmoni26,
You were heading in the right direction! Take a look at the screenshot below:
You were heading in the right direction! Take a look at the screenshot below:
- Attachments
-
Ready4
Hello Rich & Spencer,
Thanks alot for your input, I guess, i assumed w = 7, but did not take into consideration that t/w could as well be 12/14....
someday, i will be free....
Thanks alot for your input, I guess, i assumed w = 7, but did not take into consideration that t/w could as well be 12/14....
someday, i will be free....


















