-
[email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Thanked: 3 times
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
GMAT1
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
-
theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Thanked: 448 times
- GMAT Score:650
-
[email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Thanked: 3 times
Here is the explanation
The background is people with rds equipped radio can listen to those programs
Premise : stations increased but no of radios equipped with rds tech dnt increase
Conclusion : no of people hearing the rds program did not increase SIGNIFICANTLY
This is lying on the assumption that there are some ppl who had rds equipped radios before itself because stations grew and radios are constant
In Find assumption questions always choose an answer which if not true will make the conclusion impossible to be derived from the premise
When you read A it says there are people having rds equipped radios already but dnt Lsn to the rds program because of no reach so this is a case with constant number of radios Also it says few people are like tht so even if u feel If those ppl who are living in those areas now after 1994 got access increased the total number verdlanders by a very small number .... Remember the argument doesn't say doesn't increase at all it says doesnt increase significantly ..
The background is people with rds equipped radio can listen to those programs
Premise : stations increased but no of radios equipped with rds tech dnt increase
Conclusion : no of people hearing the rds program did not increase SIGNIFICANTLY
This is lying on the assumption that there are some ppl who had rds equipped radios before itself because stations grew and radios are constant
In Find assumption questions always choose an answer which if not true will make the conclusion impossible to be derived from the premise
When you read A it says there are people having rds equipped radios already but dnt Lsn to the rds program because of no reach so this is a case with constant number of radios Also it says few people are like tht so even if u feel If those ppl who are living in those areas now after 1994 got access increased the total number verdlanders by a very small number .... Remember the argument doesn't say doesn't increase at all it says doesnt increase significantly ..
In love with "beatthegmat",I do not need any coaching I get all my doubt solved here on this 1 place...
thanks to all the experts!!
thanks to all the experts!!
