MIT is unique in that adcom interviews everyone, so they interview a fixed number of applicants in each of rounds 1 and 2. From what i know, only like 12-13% of round 2 applicants get interviews. If i can't do round 1, is it even worth applying to sloan round 2? Also, how friendly are they towards re-applicants?
Great questions - this shows you've done you're homework on this program! We always like to see that.
It's still possible for a strong candidate to get into MIT in Round 2 but it's not as easy, just based on the numbers. Your assessment is correct on that. It's always an advantage at any school to apply in Rd 1 - with MIT, it's a *real* advantage. But they still admit half the class from Rd 2! If it takes you that long to get a good app together, then that's a perfectly fine strategy.
Your statement is not quite accurate below though - you said "MIT is unique in that adcom interviews everyone" -- you're right that the adcom are the ones doing the interviews, and they interview everyone before offering a spot (interviews are mandatory for admission), but they don't interview everyone who applies. We think you probably had this straight in your head but it didn't come out exactly right when you wrote it, so we wanted to clarify for anyone else who may wander in.
Finally, Sloan is INCREDIBLY reapplicant-friendly - they love to get a stronger app the next time through and will most definitely be receptive to you if you end up in that boat.
Hopefully you don't though - maybe there's a way you can pull off the first round (it's not till later in October, one of the furtherest-outtest Rd 1s) - or if not, then good luck with Rd 2 instead!
EssaySnark












