Time a factor in score?

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 3:21 am

Time a factor in score?

by hazpazfaz » Sun May 24, 2009 4:08 am
I was just wondering if the amount of time you take to do one section, or a single question influences your score?

Example: Would somebody with 20 minutes to spare have a higher score than somebody with 1 min. to spare?

or

Would somebody who takes 1 min for a question get a higher score for that question than someone who takes 2 mins.?

Thanks
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Sun May 24, 2009 8:09 am
I don't think time counts in your score. Since this is an adaptive test, the number of questions you get wrong and their "distribution" is the important part. Experts can confirm that the time you have left at the end of your test does not influence your score: after all, you already have a time limit and this is not the math/verbal marathon!

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 3:29 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 185 times
Followed by:15 members

by VP_Jim » Sun May 24, 2009 8:21 am
Definitely not - how much time you take does not affect your score. Personally, I think it's the opposite - people who finish with 20 minutes left typically don't score very well! Personally, I always go down to the wire in quant and have a few minutes left in verbal. Unless you're scoring 99th percentile, finishing early is silly, since finishing early means you could've spent more time on questions you got wrong and, presumably, gotten more of them right.
Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 11:28 am
Thanked: 3 times

by 4score20 » Mon May 25, 2009 11:26 am
It's not likely that the amount of time as you describe is a factor. Working at a steady pace is probably best. Rushing through can lead to careless errors.