BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data Sufficiency - Integers Question

Expert replies
by jamie_700 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:10 am
Hi all, I've come across this data sufficiency question on integers and I have some serious trouble understanding its concept.

If P is a set of integers and 3 is in P, is every positive multiple of 3 in P?

1) For any integer in P, the sum of 3 and that integer is also in P.

2) For any integer in P, that integer minus 3 is also in P.

Thank you in advance!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by crackgmat007 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:54 am
Is it A?

Question is asking whether every positive multiple of 3 is in Set P.

2) For any integer in P, that integer minus 3 is also in P.

This statement confirms that all negative multiples of 3 are in set P.

Question states that 3 is in the set. THis means that 3-3 = 0, 0-3 = -3 & so on are in the set...

1) For any integer in P, the sum of 3 and that integer is also in P.

Using the same approach we can answer the question as yes.

HTH
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:40 pm
IMO - E

Set could be - 0, 3, 6, 9 or 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:14 pm
mehravikas wrote:IMO - E

Set could be - 0, 3, 6, 9 or 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
I guess we can still answer the question 'is every positive multiple of 3 in P?'

Can you let me know your reasoning?
Join the discussion

jamie_700 wrote:Hi all, I've come across this data sufficiency question on integers and I have some serious trouble understanding its concept.

If P is a set of integers and 3 is in P, is every positive multiple of 3 in P?

1) For any integer in P, the sum of 3 and that integer is also in P.

2) For any integer in P, that integer minus 3 is also in P.
Question: are {3, 6, 9, 12, ...} all in set P?

(1) if n is in P, then so is n + 3

Well, we know that 3 is in the set. Therefore, 3+3=6 is in the set. Therefore, 6+3=9 is in the set... and so on, and so on, and so on ... Are all the positive multiples of 3 in the set? Definitely YES: sufficient.

As Mehravikas notes, there could certainly be other numbers in the set as well. Do we care? Nope - the question doesn't ask "are ONLY all the positive multiples of 3 in the set?", so other numbers are irrelevant.

(2) if n is in P, then so is n - 3

The only number we know about for sure is 3, so all we know is that {3, 0, -3, -6, ...} are in the set. Is it possible that all positive multiples of 3 are there as well? Sure. Do they have to be there? No. Therefore, (2) is insufficient.

(1) is sufficient, (2) is insufficient: choose (A).

edit: bad use of question mark!
Last edited by Stuart@KaplanGMAT on Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:01 pm
My mistake...I misread the question.

We can still prove it by statement 1.

Thanks Stuart.
crackgmat007 wrote:
mehravikas wrote:IMO - E

Set could be - 0, 3, 6, 9 or 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
I guess we can still answer the question 'is every positive multiple of 3 in P?'

Can you let me know your reasoning?
Join the discussion

by jamie_700 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:29 pm
Thanks for all the help on this question guys. In particular, thank you Stuart for the thorough explainations. Its all very helpful!
Join the discussion