How children choose punishments

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:03 am
Thanked: 3 times

How children choose punishments

by EricKryk » Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:57 pm
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
Thanked: 335 times
Followed by:98 members

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:11 pm
Notice that in order to argue that younger children don't regard intention as relevant, the author must assume that the young children have the ability to discern intention in the first place. If these kids are not mature enough to discern intentions, we cannot argue that they regard intention as irrelevant.

I go through each answer choice in the full solution below (taken from the GMATFix App).

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:51 am
Location: Pune

by ameya85 » Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:01 am
This is a Weaken question and hence, conclusion of the argument is at question. Conclusion here is - Younger children do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment. To arrive at the right answer we also need to see the underlying assumption that author makes. I feel by making this conclusion, author assumes that children are able to differentiate intentions and if this assumption is true, then and only then conclusion stands correct.

We also need to notice the difference here - Younger Childern & Older Children. As conclusion is about Younger Children, we can safely eliminate answer choices that talk about so we can eliminate (D). If we take answer choices as they are, then (B) should strengthen the argument and not weaken. As in this case, children decided on punishments as severity of harm was mentioned. So we can eliminate (B) as well.

Option (C) is too generalized. As Conclusion is specifically about younger children, we can eliminate answer that generalizes from a specific conclusion.

Option (E) contradicts conclusion and might be considered as a contender for this reason. However, it was also clearly mentioned in the argument that younger children assigned punishments that did not vary according to intentions. So this option is a bit weaker compared to (A)

Coming at (A), this choice tells us that children, perhaps, did not understand the intentions as someone with mature sense of human psychology could have.

And I personally feel this should be the answer.

Answer should be A