BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Lemonade Stand

Expert replies

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:54 pm
singhpreet1 wrote:oops sorry i got it now, i missed out that the price was provided for each of the bottles and the sizes as well. so St.2 is sufficient independently to answer the question. .52x+. 58y= 4.92 i hope i got right this time around!

thanks.
I didn't do anything, but you're welcome :-)
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by gmatruler » Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:42 am
Patrick_GMATFix wrote:Hello osirus,

Indeed (2) is sufficient. It allows you to write the equation 52x + 58y = 492 --> 26x+29y=246 where x and y are the number of lemonade drinks sold at 52 cents and 58 cents respectively.

In general when you have two variables, you don't have enough info to solve. The key here is that x and y must be integers; this severely limits the range of possible values (actually it limits the range to a unique solution).

Under certain circumstances, you will have sufficiency even though there are two variables. I've discussed these circumstances in two posts in another thread: In short, because 246 in the equation above is smaller than the LCM(26,29) + 26, and because x and y are integers, you can be certain that there is a unique set of values that can work.

Hope that helps,
-Patrick
Just wanted to add my thanks to the others. Really great tip. Much appreciated
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:57 am
Patrick_GMATFix wrote:My apologies. I was being careless. Thank you for pointing it out. In fact, I meant LCM(26,29)+26. If this value is greater than the sum, then we'll have a unique solution. Otherwise, it depends.

-Patrick
Hi Patrick,

Can you please tell how this equation works out? Actually, I did not get Why we are taking LCM and then adding 26 to it.
Why is it not 29? What is the history of this Rule.

Appreciate your help..
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:07 pm
osirus0830 wrote:Julie opened a lemonade stand and sold lemonade in two different sizes, a 52-cent (12oz) size and a 58-cent (16 oz) size. How many 52-cent lemonade drinks did Julie sell?

(1) Julie sold a total of 9 lemonades.

(2) The total value of the lemonade drinks Julie sold was $4.92

OA [spoiler]B I got this answer correct. My question is how can you determine that there is only one value integer value for the 52 cent drinks that would also allow the value for the 58 cent drinks to be an integer, without testing each individual integer cases? The book says that you don't have to calculate each case, you know that there is only one value for the 52 cent drinks that would allow the 58 cent drinks to also be an integer, my question is how do you know this?[/spoiler]
how could you answer its B
can you explain why the answer is B
Join the discussion

by Haaress » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:04 pm
Patrick wrote - In short, because 246 in the equation above is smaller than the LCM(26,29) + 52, and because x and y are integers, you can be certain that there is a unique set of values that can work.

Question - If 246 was more than the LCM(x, y) + min(x,y), would that mean that there are more than one set solution for the equation?

Thanks Patrick!
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:06 pm
Haaress wrote: If 246 was more than the LCM(x, y) + min(x,y), would that mean that there are more than one set solution for the equation?
Not necessarily. If the total is greater, then it depends. However if the total is equal to or less, then you can be sure that there is only one solution.

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion