BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

electric vehicles

Expert replies
by aj5105 » Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:59 am
A major impediment to wide acceptance of electric vehicles even on the part of people who use their cars almost
exclusively for commuting is the inability to use electric vehicles for occasional extended trips. In an attempt to
make purchasing electric vehicles more attractive to commuters, one electric vehicle producer is planning to
offer customers three days free rental of a conventional car for every 1,000 miles that they drive their electric
vehicle.
Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan’s prospects for success?
(A) Many eclectic vehicles that are used for commercial purposes are not needed for extended trips.
(B) Because a majority of commuters drive at least 100 miles a week, the cost to the producer of making good
the offer would add considerably to the already high price of electric vehicles.
(C) The relatively long time it takes to recharge the battery of an electric vehicle can easily be fitted into the
regular patterns of car use characteristic of commuters.
(D) Although eclectic vehicles are essentially emission-free in actual use, generating the electricity necessary
for charging an electric vehicle’s battery can burden the environment.
(E) Some family vehicles are used primarily not for commuting but for making short local trips, such as to do
errands.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sethids » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:54 pm
The argument says that the a electric vehicle manufacturer is trying to attract customers by making an offer.
We need to find out reasons why the offer should be unattractive or not as attractive to the prospective buyers.

One of the reasons is the high price of the commodity.

This is mentioned by option B which is my choice for the answer.

Looking at other options:
A. Talks only about electric vehicles used for commercial purpose. Too narrow.
C. Suggests that one of the limitation of electric vehicles should not affect the users much. This supports the use of electric vehicles.
D. Out of scope. No impact on the environment is discussed in the argument.
E. Talks about a specific use of electric vehicles by some families. This is narrow and irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by bradley281 » Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:37 pm
The question asks what would threaten the success of the offering.

If commuters were driving 100+ miles a week, then the offering would not be successful b/c they would be handing out free rental cars left and right.

Thus, the answer is B
Join the discussion

by sethids » Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:47 pm
bradley281 wrote:The question asks what would threaten the success of the offering.

If commuters were driving 100+ miles a week, then the offering would not be successful b/c they would be handing out free rental cars left and right.

Thus, the answer is B
If the company could afford to do that and keep a low or a competitive price for the electric cars then it should not be a problem if it has to give a free rental car to most of the people.
I believe the most important point mentioned in B is that it will ultimately add up to the cost which will be recovered from the prospective buyers who will not be interested in buying the vehicles at a much higher price than usual.
This is what would make the proposal unsuccessful.
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:40 pm
i'm having a hard time choosing between B and E.

the OA would help.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:00 am
3 day free rental for 100 miles electric car drive

The threat could be that the company is not able to afford teh cost
or
3 day trip is very expansive
So Ans is B



E says
Vehicle is needed for short trips
can not be related to cost
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:34 am
OA - B.
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Sat Sep 27, 2008 8:04 pm
where is the source? please
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:39 am
Can u please give l'l more input on why are u saying option A as too narrow?
sethids wrote:The argument says that the a electric vehicle manufacturer is trying to attract customers by making an offer.
We need to find out reasons why the offer should be unattractive or not as attractive to the prospective buyers.

One of the reasons is the high price of the commodity.

This is mentioned by option B which is my choice for the answer.

Looking at other options:
A. Talks only about electric vehicles used for commercial purpose. Too narrow.
C. Suggests that one of the limitation of electric vehicles should not affect the users much. This supports the use of electric vehicles.
D. Out of scope. No impact on the environment is discussed in the argument.
E. Talks about a specific use of electric vehicles by some families. This is narrow and irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:41 am
Is there any difference between what you said and what stop @ 800 said?

stop @ 800 quote :

3 day free rental for 100 miles electric car drive

The threat could be that the company is not able to afford teh cost
or
3 day trip is very expansive

bradley281 wrote:The question asks what would threaten the success of the offering.

If commuters were driving 100+ miles a week, then the offering would not be successful b/c they would be handing out free rental cars left and right.

Thus, the answer is B
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:42 am
Well i am confused between whats wrong in A and why is B the correct answer.
:-(
niraj_a wrote:i'm having a hard time choosing between B and E.

the OA would help.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:20 pm
B seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:21 pm
I think B is the right answer here.
Join the discussion