BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

line intersection??

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 4:12 pm

line intersection??

by ch0719 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:26 pm
This is a question from MGMAT CAT online

My answer was D, but answer provided by MGMAT is A, and here is the explanation:

[spoiler]Lines are said to intersect if they share one or more points. In the graph, line segment QR connects points (1, 3) and (2, 2). The slope of a line is the change in y divided by the change in x, or rise/run. The slope of line segment QR is (3 – 2)/(1 – 2) = 1/-1 = -1.

(1) SUFFICIENT: The equation of line S is given in y = mx + b format, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. The slope of line S is therefore -1, the same as the slope of line segment QR. Line S and line segment QR are parallel, so they will not intersect unless line S passes through both Q and R, and thus the entire segment. To determine whether line S passes through QR, plug the coordinates of Q and R into the equation of line S. If they satisfy the equation, then QR lies on line S.

Point Q is (1, 3):
y = -x + 4 = -1 + 4 = 3
Point Q is on line S.

Point R is (2, 2):
y = -x + 4 = -2 + 4 = 2
Point R is on line S.

Line segment QR lies on line S, so they share many points. Therefore, the answer is "yes," Line S intersects line segment QR.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: Line S has the same slope as line segment QR, so they are parallel. They might intersect; for example, if Line S passes through points Q and R. But they might never intersect; for example, if Line S passes above or below line segment QR.

The correct answer is A. [/spoiler]


So here's my question: if Line S passes through points Q and R does it mean they intersect? Because imo for S to intersect with the line QR, line S must be able to devide line QR into two parts, thus if the slope of line S is same with the slope of QR then it means they will never intersect. I also remember that the theory goes two parallel lines never intersect.

Any other opinions? :shock:
Attachments
gmattemp.jpg
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:57 pm
This one puzzles me also.

Stmt I and II pretty much gives the same info.

I would have choose D) also.

I am unable to understand how parallel lines will ever intersect. May be we are missing something.

The reason given for 1 could apply for 2 also since the slopes are being considered.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:01 pm
statement 1: says the lines are distinct and parallel.
statement 2: lines have same slope, we do not know if lines are distinct

have a confusion: are coincident lines said to intersect? i thought intersection meant cutting the line at a distinct point.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:43 am
The axiom in Euclidian Geometry is that parallel lines never intersect.

The axiom in non-Euclidian Geometry is that parallel lines intersect at infinity.

Statement 1) gives us the same line in question stem. So they overlap, is overlapping an intersection ? SURE ( You can also hear from a mathematician NO! )

Statement 2) IT might or MIGHT NOT - Slopes are the same but we don't know any other information about the line.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:22 am
Location: Mumbai,India
Thanked: 1 times

by bsandhyav » Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:46 am
cramya wrote:This one puzzles me also.

Stmt I and II pretty much gives the same info.

I would have choose D) also.

I am unable to understand how parallel lines will ever intersect. May be we are missing something.

The reason given for 1 could apply for 2 also since the slopes are being considered.


Def'n of intersecting lines: If a line has 1 or more points in common with another line the lines are said to be intersecting lines.


Coincident lines have all points in common ( i.e one or more than one). Hence they are considered to be intersecting lines.


St 1 : Since this statement gives the equation of the line S we can verify that the points on the segment coincide with that of line S. Hence the answer is YES. They are coincident lines


St2: This statement just mentions that the two slopes are the same(i.e -1).
This implies that the lines are either parllel (ie. non intersecting) or co-incident (which according to the def'n above are intersecting).
Hence we cannot say anything surely.

So St 1 alone is sufficient and st 2 is not IMO A

Hope this could make it clearer
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:51 pm
Thanks Sandhya!
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:06 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by rajataga » Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:55 am
ch017, wat you were talking about is called 'bisection' that is dividing the line into half.

Intersection is just a common point/s between 2 figures.
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:15 pm
Location: MD
Thanked: 2 times

by GMAT680 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:20 pm
I think the explanation for statement 2 need to be. The lines are parallel and will never intersect. On the other hand, the given slope can be a slope of the given line. Hence, it overlaps (intersects).

That is the only justification to dispute choice. However, it disputes the golden rule of parallel lines will never cross each other.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:13 am
Thanks for posting this ques....

a new maths concept learned after a long time......

GREAT DUDE....!!! keep posting such concept twisting ques.... Thanks once again....!!!
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:43 am

by sarthak » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:32 am
New concept ..... hmmm interesting ... guys pls keep on posting such questions
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:38 am
Today I got this question in MGMAT CAT. Quite tricky, has anyone seen anything like that ever on GMAT ?

Does anyone knows how GMAT considers below defn..??

Def'n of intersecting lines: If a line has 1 or more points in common with another line the lines are said to be intersecting lines.


Coincident lines have all points in common ( i.e one or more than one). Hence they are considered to be intersecting lines.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:52 am
sumanr84 wrote:Today I got this question in MGMAT CAT. Quite tricky, has anyone seen anything like that ever on GMAT ?

Does anyone knows how GMAT considers below defn..??

Def'n of intersecting lines: If a line has 1 or more points in common with another line the lines are said to be intersecting lines.


Coincident lines have all points in common ( i.e one or more than one). Hence they are considered to be intersecting lines.
Very tricky indeed. I have no idea about how GMAT treats those definitions. But I believe the idea of the problem is correct.

Maths definition only says that two lines are said to be parallel when they are slopes are equal. This problem exploits that definition by making both the lines same. Need to give credit to the designer of this problem.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1