BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Machu Picchu

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:20 am
Driving the steep road to the mountaintop Inca ruins of Machu Picchu is potentially dangerous and hiking there is difficult. Now the Peruvian government is installing a cable car that will make access much easier, and hence results in a large increase in tourisms. However, since the presence of large numbers of tourists tends to accelerate the deterioration of a site, installation of a cable car is certain to result in harm to the ruins.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the argument?

A. The daily number of tourists that are expected to take the cable car to Machu Picchu is smaller than the original resident
B. The construction of the cable car terminal at Machu Picchu will require the use of potentially damaging heavy machinery at the site.
C. Machu Picchu is already one of the most popular tourist sites in Peru
D. Natural weathering will continue to be a more significant cause of the deterioration of Machu Picchu than tourist traffic
E. The cable car will replace the tour buses whose large wheels and corrosive exhaust at present do significant damage to the site.


OA: E

can someone explain this one?
I eliminated A and C. But chose D instead.

thank u so much!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by charu_mahajan » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:37 am
Hello amysky,

The official question has been twisted a bit to create this one, which brings me to a question - what is the source of your postings?

Meanwhile -

Argument concludes - installation of a cable car is certain to result in harm to the ruins.

Question - Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the argument. So, one just needs to find an explanation or reason as to why the cable car will not harm the ruins and which is precisely what E does.

The cable car will replace (We are considering this to be TRUE - Did you read the question - Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the argument? ) tour buses that were damaging the ruins.

As for D - All I can say is that if - Natural weathering will continue to be a more significant cause of the deterioration of Machu Picchu than tourist traffic - Now Macha Picchu is in real danger. Because now it has to face both natural weathering and tourist traffic. It does not explain why cable car is a good idea.
Join the discussion

by hemant_rajput » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:38 am
hey let me tell you this thing first that at first look even I fell for option D. But then I saw OA and I realize that damn man I did a mistake in hurry.

now here is the explanation.

option D suggest that Natural weathering will continue to cause more harm than tourism will do, but it is not raising questions on damage caused by cable car in compassion to driving transport. So i would say if E is missing the best answer will be D.

Now Here E says that installing cable car will reduce the harm to the site, which is in contradiction to the conclusion stated in last sentence. Hope it makes it clear.
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:19 am
option D is completely irrelevant to our plan i.e. installing cable cars for the tourists. for all you know these ruins might be located on the fault line - does that weaken our argument?
Join the discussion