BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Rooms-Students assignment

Expert replies
by kvcpk » Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:54 am
A school administrator will assign each student in
a group of n students to one of m classrooms. If
3 < m < 13 < n, is it possible to assign each of the
n students to one of the m classrooms so that each
classroom has the same number of students assigned
to it?
(1) It is possible to assign each of 3n students to
one of m classrooms so that each classroom
has the same number of students assigned to it.
(2) It is possible to assign each of 13n students to
one of m classrooms so that each classroom
has the same number of students assigned to it.

OA is B. Can Somene please explain?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by liferocks » Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:59 am
From 1
3n=mk where k is any integer
or n=mk/3 now k/3 may or may not be integer depending on which n may or may not be a multiple of m..insufficient

From 2

13n=mk or n=mk/13
since 3<m<13,k/13 has to an integer so that mk/13 is integer..sufficient
Ans option B
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:24 am
This is a pretty tough divisibility question. It basically asks whether we can distribute n kids into m equal groups. In other words, REPHRASE: Is n divisible by m?

This is #128 in OG12. Detailed solution and take-away are attached below.

-Patrick
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:09 am
liferocks wrote: From 2

13n=mk or n=mk/13
since 3<m<13,k/13 has to an integer so that mk/13 is integer..sufficient
Ans option B
Hi,

I understood why the first statement is insufficient. But the second statement is confusing. Can you please tell me why k/13 has to be an integer?
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:11 am
Patrick_GMATFix wrote:This is a pretty tough divisibility question. It basically asks whether we can distribute n kids into m equal groups. In other words, REPHRASE: Is n divisible by m?

This is #128 in OG12. Detailed solution and take-away are attached below.

-Patrick
Hi patrick,

The link says that the access is denied. Can you please look into it?
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:14 am
kvcpk wrote:
Hi patrick,

The link says that the access is denied. Can you please look into it?
Hi kvcpk. Not sure why you can't see the solution I've written; 10 ppl have already downloaded it. Send me a PM and I'd be glad to help.
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:16 am
kvcpk wrote:
liferocks wrote: From 2

13n=mk or n=mk/13
since 3<m<13,k/13 has to an integer so that mk/13 is integer..sufficient
Ans option B
Hi,

I understood why the first statement is insufficient. But the second statement is confusing. Can you please tell me why k/13 has to be an integer?
13n=mk or n=mk/13
here LHS(n) is integer so RHS has to be integer
i.e mk/13 is integer
now m<13 and 13 is a prime so only way mk/13 is an integer when k/13 is integer.
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:36 am
liferocks wrote:
kvcpk wrote:
liferocks wrote: From 2

13n=mk or n=mk/13
since 3<m<13,k/13 has to an integer so that mk/13 is integer..sufficient
Ans option B
13n=mk or n=mk/13
here LHS(n) is integer so RHS has to be integer
i.e mk/13 is integer
now m<13 and 13 is a prime so only way mk/13 is an integer when k/13 is integer.
Why cant we apply the same analysis to premise1:

3n=mk or n= mk/3
here also n is integer. so mk/3 has to be integer. m is already integer. So k/3 has to be an integer.

??
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:16 am
kvcpk wrote:
liferocks wrote:
kvcpk wrote:
liferocks wrote: From 2

13n=mk or n=mk/13
since 3<m<13,k/13 has to an integer so that mk/13 is integer..sufficient
Ans option B
13n=mk or n=mk/13
here LHS(n) is integer so RHS has to be integer
i.e mk/13 is integer
now m<13 and 13 is a prime so only way mk/13 is an integer when k/13 is integer.
Why cant we apply the same analysis to premise1:

3n=mk or n= mk/3
here also n is integer. so mk/3 has to be integer. m is already integer. So k/3 has to be an integer.

??
for 1 n=mk/3 now either m/3 or k/3 can be integer since 3<m
in which case n will not be divisible by 3
ex m=6,k=7 in that case mk=42=3*n ..so n=14 which is not divisible by m=6
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:57 am
liferocks wrote:
kvcpk wrote:
liferocks wrote:
kvcpk wrote:
liferocks wrote:
for 1 n=mk/3 now either m/3 or k/3 can be integer since 3<m
in which case n will not be divisible by 3
ex m=6,k=7 in that case mk=42=3*n ..so n=14 which is not divisible by m=6
Thanks for your response and patience. I get it now. There cannot be any multiple of m below 13. It looks simple..but easily distracting..
Join the discussion