BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number property

Expert replies
by gabriel » Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:32 pm
q.) Calculate the sum of all the possible factors of the number 14400.

No options :P . I just made up this question, I had seen a similar question elsewhere and thought I would share it with everyone here. There is something very interesting to learn over here.

Regards.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by leovonp » Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:06 pm
You mean all 42 of them?
Doesn't seem like a feasible exam question
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:43 pm
It has 63 factors. The sum of the divisors should be 51,181. I'm only able to do that quickly using the multiplicative property of the sigma function, which no one would ever be expected to know on the GMAT. I can get there from scratch as follows:

14,400 = 2^6 * 3^2 * 5^2

It has nine odd divisors:
1, 3, 5, 3^2, 5^2, 3*5, 3^2*5, 3*5^2, 3^2*5^2

Let's add these up and call it S:

S = 1+3+5+3^2+5^2+3*5+3^2*5 +3*5^2 + 3^2*5^2
S = 403

Now, we get the rest of the divisors by multiplying each of the odd divisors by 2^1, 2^2, 2^3, 2^4, 2^5 and 2^6. That gives us all 63 divisors. When we multiply the odd divisors by 2^1 and add together the nine new divisors we get, the sum will just be 2^1 * S. When we do the same for 2^2, the sum will be 2^2 * S. And so on. So the sum of all the divisors must be:

S + 2^1*S + 2^2*S + ... + 2^6*S
= (1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + 32 + 64)*S
= 127*S
= 127*403
= 51,181

That's like a 900-level GMAT question though!
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:00 am
leovonp wrote:You mean all 42 of them?
Doesn't seem like a feasible exam question
The reason I chose a large number is so that once you solve this you should be able to do the smaller ones easily.

There is a pretty straight forward formula for calculating this.

Consider a number N which is divided into its prime factors as N=a^x*b*y*c^z . The sum of all the divisors of such a number is given by the formula

(a^0+a^1+a^2+......+a^x)(b^0+b^1+.....+b^y)(c^0+c^1+c^2+....+c^z)

So for 14400= 2^6*3^2*5^2 we have

(1+2+4+8+16+32+64)*(1+3+9)*(1+5+25) = 127*13*31 = 51181. This example can be extended to any number of primes with any index.

Let me know in case of any difficulty

Regards
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:40 am
gabriel wrote: Consider a number N which is divided into its prime factors as N=a^x*b*y*c^z . The sum of all the divisors of such a number is given by the formula

(a^0+a^1+a^2+......+a^x)(b^0+b^1+.....+b^y)(c^0+c^1+c^2+....+c^z)
There's a simpler formula which saves you from needing to do those sums. sigma is the name given, in Number Theory, to the function that sums the divisors.

If N = a^x*b*y*c^z, where a, b and c are different primes:
then sigma(N) = [(a^(x+1) - 1)/(a-1)]*[(b^(y+1) - 1)/(b-1)]*[(c^(z+1) - 1)/(c-1)]

So for N = 2^6*3^2*5^2

sigma(N) = [2^7 - 1]*[(3^3 - 1)/2]*[(5^3 - 1)/4] = 127*13*31

Not that you'll ever need to use that on the GMAT.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:29 am
@Ian it is the same formula. Except that you use the "sum of a GP" formula to make it a tad simpler.

Regards
Join the discussion

by beeparoo » Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:27 pm
Oooh.. It's like watching a battle of the experts.

I'm going to go and seek out a giant foam finger...
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:47 pm
beeparoo wrote:Oooh.. It's like watching a battle of the experts.

I'm going to go and seek out a giant foam finger...
:lol: :lol: . Are you trying to start something over here :twisted: . But seriously I have utmost respect for Ian and sincerely believe that he is very good at what he does. Moreover I am not an expert in GMAT, just a geek who likes math.

Regards

PS: - btw ... whom were you rooting for :wink: :P
Join the discussion

by beeparoo » Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:47 pm
gabriel wrote: :lol: :lol: . Are you trying to start something over here :twisted: . But seriously I have utmost respect for Ian and sincerely believe that he is very good at what he does. Moreover I am not an expert in GMAT, just a geek who likes math.

Regards

PS: - btw ... whom were you rooting for :wink: :P
Start something? Heavens - YES! I'd like to be a spectator of a battle of wits. Luckily, both sides are are equipped.

I take no sides here since I like to root for the underdogs and neither of you present to be such.

Cheers,
Sandra
Join the discussion