BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Confusing SC question in Princeton's free CAT

Expert replies
by jaymw » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 am
Hi!

I just gave the Princeton free CAT, checked where I went wrong and came across a seemingly odd explanation for one of the SC questions. Maybe some of you can help me understand the following. SO here goes:



Contestants entering the competition for the third or fourth time are likely to be at a significant advantage and are frequently able to outperform their less-seasoned rivals.



a)likely to be at a significant advantage and are frequently able to



b)likely significantly advantaged and frequently able to



c)liable to be significantly advantaged and can frequently



d)liable that they are at a significant advantage and can frequently



e)at a significant advantage, frequently likely to be able that they can

While c through e) are obviously nonsensical, I was torn between a) and b) and my gut feeling wanted the latter.

I admit that this version sounds a bit clumsy, however, I cannot figure out what's wrong with it. Princeton says the following to answer choice b): No. Parallel construction. "Advantaged" is a noun, and "able" is a verb.

I am not a native English speaker, but I am pretty sure that "advantaged" is an adjective and so is "able", so be advantaged and be able to... sounds parallel to me!

Any thoughts on this? I would appreciate it.

Thanks
Jan
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by novel » Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:08 am
IMO C

able to in A and B sounds odd
D-That is unnecessary
E---to be able that they can----wordy and illogical
Join the discussion

by jaymw » Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:18 am
I forgot to include in my message that according to Princeton answer choice a is right.

And yes, I agree that the sentences all sound odd.
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:14 am
jaymw wrote:Hi!

I just gave the Princeton free CAT, checked where I went wrong and came across a seemingly odd explanation for one of the SC questions. Maybe some of you can help me understand the following. SO here goes:



Contestants entering the competition for the third or fourth time are likely to be at a significant advantage and are frequently able to outperform their less-seasoned rivals.



a)likely to be at a significant advantage and are frequently able to



b)likely significantly advantaged and frequently able to



c)liable to be significantly advantaged and can frequently



d)liable that they are at a significant advantage and can frequently



e)at a significant advantage, frequently likely to be able that they can

While c through e) are obviously nonsensical, I was torn between a) and b) and my gut feeling wanted the latter.

I admit that this version sounds a bit clumsy, however, I cannot figure out what's wrong with it. Princeton says the following to answer choice b): No. Parallel construction. "Advantaged" is a noun, and "able" is a verb.

I am not a native English speaker, but I am pretty sure that "advantaged" is an adjective and so is "able", so be advantaged and be able to... sounds parallel to me!

Any thoughts on this? I would appreciate it.

Thanks
Jan
my 2 cents on this are as follows:

I agree that C, D & E can be eliminated for various reasons... Between A & B... I would go with choice A.... My reasons for the same are as follows:

In B... likely significantly advantaged and frequently able to is not correct... likely significantly are two adverbs used together... this is not correct usage... do u say...

1. She is likely beautifully the best actress to win the miss universe crown...
2. He is adversly affectedly by the breakdown...
Join the discussion

by jaymw » Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:31 pm
Thanks for your thougths.

I'm still not sure tho. If you take out the "significantly", the sentence reads "He is likely advantaged..." which is a sentence. "She is likely beautifully" is not a correct sentence.

But anyway, I ll just keep my fingers crossed that such a question won't show up on the actual gmat;)
Join the discussion

by karanrulz4ever » Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:11 pm
E changes the meaning.
C and D use 'liable'. There is a slight difference between likely and liable.
B "likely significantly advantaged" is awkward to say the least.
Though A might be wordy, its the best of all the options.
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:48 pm
jaymw wrote:Hi!

I just gave the Princeton free CAT, checked where I went wrong and came across a seemingly odd explanation for one of the SC questions. Maybe some of you can help me understand the following. SO here goes:



Contestants entering the competition for the third or fourth time are likely to be at a significant advantage and are frequently able to outperform their less-seasoned rivals.



a)likely to be at a significant advantage and are frequently able to



b)likely significantly advantaged and frequently able to



c)liable to be significantly advantaged and can frequently



d)liable that they are at a significant advantage and can frequently



e)at a significant advantage, frequently likely to be able that they can

While c through e) are obviously nonsensical, I was torn between a) and b) and my gut feeling wanted the latter.

I admit that this version sounds a bit clumsy, however, I cannot figure out what's wrong with it. Princeton says the following to answer choice b): No. Parallel construction. "Advantaged" is a noun, and "able" is a verb.

I am not a native English speaker, but I am pretty sure that "advantaged" is an adjective and so is "able", so be advantaged and be able to... sounds parallel to me!

Any thoughts on this? I would appreciate it.

Thanks
Jan

Just two things:

1. Likely to + Verb---is correct expression though there may have "likely that".
2. Likely to + Blah blah blah......+ Verb is not correct because it creates the split infinitive.

A is correct.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by sumit.sinha » Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:38 am
IMO A.
Parallelism.

Contestants ARE likely to be at a significant advantage and ARE frequently able to...
Cheers,
Sumit
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1