Kaplan weakning CR

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:02 pm
i am not agreed with OA

as rightly said by Paes " some people" :- there may be some people who knows how government works donot know how its formed

now come to argument its children of the country means all children not some people should know how government works
so they should be taught how government formed.

option B clearly strengthen the argument not weaken it
option B says about some people and argument says childrens or everyone

please convince or get convinced
A SMALL TOWN GUY

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:43 pm
Pradeep@

Brian has given good explanation in his last post.

Let me try to explain this with a simple conversation :

Pradeep : Every cricket commentator (to be good) should be a former player.
Paes : But there are some good commentators (such as Harsha Bhogle ) who are not former player.

So obviously I am weakening your argument .

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:56 am
Thanked: 4 times

by abhigang » Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:46 pm
paes wrote:
uwhusky wrote: Thanks to Pradeep, diebeatsthegmat and Abhigang also to share their views.
I was 90% sure of this answer. Also I had the doubt about "some". But I could select this because the other two brings a correlation in place. Thanks for posting this, paes.

@Brian : Thanks a lot again for explaining the concept.