50000 Norwegian smokers

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times

50000 Norwegian smokers

by svaradhan » Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:30 am
Hi All, Please help me in resolving this CR -

According to a study of more than 50,000 Norwegian smokers, smokers who reduced their nicotine intake from cigarettes, even by up to 50 percent, did not achieve significant health benefits. The mortality rate for those who cut back on cigarettes was not lower than that for heavier smokers; moreover, the rate of cardiovascular disease was similar across all subsets of smokers in the study. As a result, the sponsors of the study claim that reducing nicotine intake does not improve one's health.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously jeopardizes the findings of the study described above?



(a) The majority of study participants minimized their nicotine withdrawal symptoms through the use of skin patches and chewing gum that provide nicotine to the body.

(b) Many of the study’s participants periodically dined in restaurants in which smoking was permitted.

(c) The study’s participants started smoking at different ages and had varied initial nicotine intake.

(d) Quitting smoking entirely results in a marked reduction in the ill effects of smoking.

(e) Men and women who smoked pipes and cigars were excluded from the study.

OA will follow after few discussions? Please let me know your explanations. Thanks in advance.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:00 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Re: 50000 Norwegian smokers

by nitin86 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:39 am
svaradhan wrote:Hi All, Please help me in resolving this CR -

According to a study of more than 50,000 Norwegian smokers, smokers who reduced their nicotine intake from cigarettes, even by up to 50 percent, did not achieve significant health benefits. The mortality rate for those who cut back on cigarettes was not lower than that for heavier smokers; moreover, the rate of cardiovascular disease was similar across all subsets of smokers in the study. As a result, the sponsors of the study claim that reducing nicotine intake does not improve one's health.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously jeopardizes the findings of the study described above?



(a) The majority of study participants minimized their nicotine withdrawal symptoms through the use of skin patches and chewing gum that provide nicotine to the body.

(b) Many of the study’s participants periodically dined in restaurants in which smoking was permitted.

(c) The study’s participants started smoking at different ages and had varied initial nicotine intake.

(d) Quitting smoking entirely results in a marked reduction in the ill effects of smoking.

(e) Men and women who smoked pipes and cigars were excluded from the study.

OA will follow after few discussions? Please let me know your explanations. Thanks in advance.
B/D/E are out of smoke.....

A seemed tempting, but A talks about removal of nicotine through other means...chewing gum...etc..it doesn't talk about whether nicotine was reduced through cigratte...

In C, it hits the assumption that "all the participants in the survey had same initial nicotine intake"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by svaradhan » Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:48 am
Hi, that's exactly how I went about solving this problem but the answer has got a different twist to it. OA is A. this appeared in one of the MGMAT CR tests. the explanation in MGMAT is as follow which defies the basic assumption itself -

"This answer choice indicates that most study participants did not actually reduce their nicotine intake; instead, they simply received nicotine from different sources. Since the data on which the conclusion is based is not reliable, the conclusion is undermined."

In one of the posts Ron has mentioned that we should accepts facts as they are but with the above explanation I see some contradiction or may be my understanding is wrong.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:34 pm

by bhuman111 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:23 pm
I think A is the best choice.

Consider these parts of the initial paragraph:
[quote]smokers who reduced their [b]nicotine intake from cigarettes[/b], even by up to 50 percent, did not achieve significant health benefits.[/quote]
[quote]As a result, the sponsors of the study claim that [b]reducing nicotine intake[/b] does not improve one's health. [/quote]

The claim made is very broad, encompassing all forms of nicotine intake. Considering option A:
[quote]The majority of study participants minimized their nicotine withdrawal symptoms through the use of skin patches and chewing gum that provide nicotine to the body.[/quote]
If study participants were not actually reducing their nicotine intake, but merely getting it from a different source, one cannot make the claim that reducing nicotine intake, in general, does not improve health.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:16 pm

by agent47 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:06 pm
I will alsi go with "A "

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:30 pm
I would go with A when it crack on the premise of the stem.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:39 pm
Thanked: 1 times

A

by hakyology » Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:25 pm
first i thought it was C but i believe A is more convincing. I am with A.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:26 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by newera » Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:28 pm
A.

The whole focus of the premises is on nicotine from cigarettes. Not just nicotine. However, the conclusion talks about ALL forms of nicotine. So in answer choice A, the participants do getting cigarette nicotine but are still getting their nicotine, just in another form. So, cigarette nicotine isn't isolated and the study's validity become jeopardized.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:53 am
but why D is wrong,

D said that if there is no nicotine, good effect exist. this weaken the conclusion and so correct.

pls, help

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:46 am
I think D is incorrect cos it talks about quitting completely and not reducing, makes it irrelevant i guess

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:33 am
Thanked: 35 times

by NikolayZ » Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:36 am
"A" definitely.

The the main point of the study of 50000 smokers is that a part of them reduced the intake of nicotine from cigarettes. The conclusion is " the intake of all forms of nicotine do not improve health".

A - clearly states that subjects who reduced the intake of cigarette nicotine, also cheated and continued to take nicotine doses in other way. Surely, this fact jeopardizes the conclusion about " all nicotine intake"