BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Very interesting geometry question

Expert replies
by student22 » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:38 pm

Code: Select all

In a coordinate system, line l is parallel to line k, does line l intersect the x-axis?

(1) Line k has slope zero.

(2) Point (0, 4) is on line k.
I found this question on a gmat blog and it didn't include the official answer, but had several possible solutions.

One solution was A, for obvious reasons.

Another solution was E stating that it's possible that line L is a coincident line, in that it's possible that it intersects the X-axis at all points.

1. Tell us that line K is a horizontal line, but it could be coincident.
2. Doesn't tell us anything.

Together: It tells us that line K is not coincident, but line L, which is parallel to K could be coincident.

I'm posting this question, since I want to hear from the gmat experts how the gmat would treat this concept on the test. Especially since I've never heard of this concept before (or at least don't remember it) nor have I seen it mentioned in any gmat book.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rockeyb » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:32 pm
student22 wrote:

Code: Select all

In a coordinate system, line l is parallel to line k, does line l intersect the x-axis?

(1) Line k has slope zero.

(2) Point (0, 4) is on line k.
I found this question on a gmat blog and it didn't include the official answer, but had several possible solutions.

One solution was A, for obvious reasons.

Another solution was E stating that it's possible that line L is a coincident line, in that it's possible that it intersects the X-axis at all points.

1. Tell us that line K is a horizontal line, but it could be coincident.
2. Doesn't tell us anything.

Together: It tells us that line K is not coincident, but line L, which is parallel to K could be coincident.

I'm posting this question, since I want to hear from the gmat experts how the gmat would treat this concept on the test. Especially since I've never heard of this concept before (or at least don't remember it) nor have I seen it mentioned in any gmat book.
I am no expert and my reasoning may be flawed , but here is my opinion .


First of all the concept being tested in not new there are question on slope of line and lines that are parallel to each other .

Now coming back to the question we are asked to find out if line L intersects X - axis .

We know slope of line L = slope of line K .

Statement (1) : Line K has slope = 0 .

That means line K is horizontal line or its parallel to X - axis .

Now line L is parallel to K . So line L may not intersect X - axis or it may run all along the X - axis and thus intersect the X - axis at all the points (coincident line).

So we can not be sure . Not Sufficient .

Statement (2):

Point (0, 4) is on line k .

Now Point (0,4) can lie on line K in 2 cases .

Case (1) Line K is parallel to Y axis and passes through point (0,4)

OR

Case (2) Line K is running all along X - axis (coincident line).

So not sure if which one of the above cases are true .

Also we know nothing about line L .

Not Sufficient .

Combine (1) and (2).

(1) Says line K has 0 slope . So case 1 is ruled out and only case 2 is the possible case.

We know line L is parallel to line K .

And since parallel lines never intersect at any point we can say line K and L will never meet at single point .

More over from Case (2) we have established that line K is touching x -axis at all the points .

Hence we can definitely say line L will never touch X - axis .

So my pick is C .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by student22 » Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:04 pm
By unfamiliar concept, I meant coincident lines.

I think you missed something in case 2 for statement 2. K is not running at the x-axis. It is either an undetermined line going through point (0, 4) or it is a parallel line to the x-axis going through point (0, 4).
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:16 pm
student22 wrote:By unfamiliar concept, I meant coincident lines.
Coincident Lines : Coincident lines are essentially two linear functions whose graphs are the same; therefore, the two lines will have the same slope and the same y-intercept. When graphed, the lines will be one on top of the other.

But I am not sure if this concept is tested in GMAT or its out of the syllabus range . So I would need some GMAT Instructor to comment on this issue.
I think you missed something in case 2 for statement 2. K is not running at the x-axis. It is either an undetermined line going through point (0, 4) or it is a parallel line to the x-axis going through point (0, 4).
Point (0,4) means y = 0 and x = 4

when y = 0 then the line either is perpendicular to X - axis or run along X - axis that passes through origin (0,0) the only other place that has y= 0 .

Also I am not clear what do you mean by "undetermined line" ?
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by student22 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:23 am
I uploaded a picture of what I think statement 2 is trying to say. Please correct me if I misunderstood it.


By undetermined line, I meant that it could have a diagonal slope (the second graph in the picture).
Image

That point on both graphs is (0, 4)
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:47 am
student22 wrote:I uploaded a picture of what I think statement 2 is trying to say. Please correct me if I misunderstood it.


By undetermined line, I meant that it could have a diagonal slope (the second graph in the picture).
Image

That point on both graphs is (0, 4)
Ahhh !!!! my mistake .

I do such silly mistakes some times . I was considering y - coordinate to be x - co ordinate.

yes the answer should be E .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:36 pm
I really do not understand that why the questions are not posted properly on such a wonderful site...

I would insist to have the questions posted properly...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion