kaplan #13

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

kaplan #13

by magical cook » Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:15 pm
13) If x is a prime number, what is the value of x?
1) X<15
2) (x-2) is a multiple of 5

Hi

Can anyone help? Correct answer will follow.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:45 am
Followed by:1 members

by agps » Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:03 am
1- x<15, there are 6 prime numbers under 16 (2,3,5,7,11,13) Not sufficient
2- (x-2) multiple of 5 true for 7 and for 17, so not sufficient.

only prime number under 15 for wich x-2 is a multiple of 5 is 7.
C is the answer

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:45 am
Followed by:1 members

by agps » Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:03 am
1- x<15, there are 6 prime numbers under 16 (2,3,5,7,11,13) Not sufficient
2- (x-2) multiple of 5 true for 7 and for 17, so not sufficient.

only prime number under 15 for wich x-2 is a multiple of 5 is 7.
C is the answer

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by magical cook » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:20 am
I thought C too but the correct answer is E)


Can anyone help us? :(

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:35 am
Thanked: 3 times

by beny » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:26 am
Kaplan claims that 0 is a multiple of 5, so the answers are 2 or 7.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:07 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:1 members

by gabriel » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:43 am
beny wrote:Kaplan claims that 0 is a multiple of 5, so the answers are 2 or 7.
Me too had heard that 0 is a multiple of every integer .. but was not sure where .. did a little digging around and this is what i got https://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60913.html ...

..magical cook i hope benys response answered your query ..

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by magical cook » Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:43 am
Thank you so much for the details.

So.....in actual GMAT math rule, zero should also be considered a multiple of every integer? (hope Kaplan and GMAT rules are the same!) :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:35 am
Thanked: 3 times

by beny » Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:47 am
GMAT ignores controversal issues (many people, including me, don't agree that 0 is a multiple of every number), so this type of question wouldn't likely be found on the GMAT. That's the problem I have with Kaplan; they try to use these little "tricks", which aren't at all realistic, to fool test takers.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by magical cook » Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:48 am
Okay - so in GMAT, the answer would be C instead of E... Thank you!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:35 am
Thanked: 3 times

by beny » Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:51 am
magical cook wrote:Okay - so in GMAT, the answer would be C instead of E... Thank you!
No... I didn't say that. I said that this question wouldn't be found on the GMAT because many people disagree over the number properties of 0. It'd be incorrect for me to claim that GMAC agrees with my personal viewpoints over Kaplan's. 8)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 484
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:01 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by magical cook » Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:55 am
Ooops, Okay - hope we will not see this kind of questions in GMAT...... :wink:

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:45 am
Followed by:1 members

by agps » Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:17 am
:evil: Kaplan has proven more than once(to me) that they can complicated as much as they can help....