The New Deal

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

The New Deal

by gmat25 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:30 am
The New Deal in America began in 1933 and included widespread bank reforms, unprecedented government infrastructure spending, and unparalleled expansion in the size of government. Some political commentators and economic historians contend that President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal singlehandedly propelled the United States out of the Great Depression and into decades of uninterrupted prosperity. To support this claim, these economists note that during the years following 1933, GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the above argument?

A) The considerable debt burden that the government assumed to fund the New Deal sparked fear in the minds of some economists, investors, and businessmen.
B) The considerable government expenditures and massive labor requirements engendered by America's entry into World War II in late 1941 helped employ Americans and grow GDP.
C) On average, GDP per capita fell and unemployment rose in many foreign countries during the years after President Roosevelt announced his New Deal.
D) During 1939, the U.S. economy contracted sharply, unemployment jumped 5%, and America's optimism fell.
E) U.S. GDP during the mid 1930s stood at levels much lower than 30 years later.

OA D
Last edited by gmat25 on Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Princeton Review CAT - 710(Q-51, V-37) --> silly mistakes screwed up my VERBAL
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:29 am
What would MOST WEAKEN would be if there were OTHER reasons for (+) outcomes, OR if after the New Deal in 1933 things did not continue to get better.

Notice how D perfectly matches our prediction. It shows that just 6 years later, things were bad again, contradicting the "decades of uninterrupted prosperity" mentioned in the argument.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:28 am
Hi Vivian,

How did you rejected B.

I thought that this is a causal argument and if we can show that it is not Roosvelt's idea but something else caused the growth in employment.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:38 pm
yes b seems the weakener.but on the other side, because

The argument is New Deal is a success and its uninterrupted prosperity.

D sounds more reasonable!
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat25 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:18 pm
Hi guys,

Even i share the same concern. Why Op B is incorrect.

argument is X ---> Y

Op B seems to possess Z cause Y situation which is usually correct in weakening questions. So why Op B is incorrect???

@vivian, please help!!!
Princeton Review CAT - 710(Q-51, V-37) --> silly mistakes screwed up my VERBAL

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:39 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

by BlindVision » Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:07 pm
gmat25 wrote:The New Deal in America began in 1933 and included widespread bank reforms, unprecedented government infrastructure spending, and unparalleled expansion in the size of government. Some political commentators and economic historians contend that President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal singlehandedly propelled the United States out of the Great Depression and into decades of uninterrupted prosperity. To support this claim, these economists note that during the years following 1933, GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the above argument?

A) The considerable debt burden that the government assumed to fund the New Deal sparked fear in the minds of some economists, investors, and businessmen.
B) The considerable government expenditures and massive labor requirements engendered by America's entry into World War II in late 1941 helped employ Americans and grow GDP.
C) On average, GDP per capita fell and unemployment rose in many foreign countries during the years after President Roosevelt announced his New Deal.
D) During 1939, the U.S. economy contracted sharply, unemployment jumped 5%, and America's optimism fell.
E) U.S. GDP during the mid 1930s stood at levels much lower than 30 years later.
Good question!

D
Life is a Test

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:03 pm
IMO B
D contradict evidence and is wrong. this kind of wrong answer is attractive for weakening questions as restate-evidence choice is wrong and attractive for strengthening questions. These traps appear a lot in GMATPREP

the concept of restate/contradict evidence choice helps us a lot.

what is oa?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat25 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:53 pm
duongthang wrote:IMO B
D contradict evidence and is wrong. this kind of wrong answer is attractive for weakening questions as restate-evidence choice is wrong and attractive for strengthening questions. These traps appear a lot in GMATPREP

the concept of restate/contradict evidence choice helps us a lot.

what is oa?
Request u to read the complete thread.
Princeton Review CAT - 710(Q-51, V-37) --> silly mistakes screwed up my VERBAL

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:57 am
Thanked: 2 times

by sophiesaurabh » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:17 pm
I still think the answer is B.

It provides an alternate reason for the growth of the US and weakens the claim when it says "SINGLEHANDEDLY propelled".

Experts please.

I would have chosen D if B were not an option.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 3:38 pm

by robosc9 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:36 pm
gmat25 wrote:The New Deal in America began in 1933 and included widespread bank reforms, unprecedented government infrastructure spending, and unparalleled expansion in the size of government. Some political commentators and economic historians contend that President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal singlehandedly propelled the United States out of the Great Depression and into decades of uninterrupted prosperity. To support this claim, these economists note that during the years following 1933, GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the above argument?

A) The considerable debt burden that the government assumed to fund the New Deal sparked fear in the minds of some economists, investors, and businessmen.
B) The considerable government expenditures and massive labor requirements engendered by America's entry into World War II in late 1941 helped employ Americans and grow GDP.
C) On average, GDP per capita fell and unemployment rose in many foreign countries during the years after President Roosevelt announced his New Deal.
D) During 1939, the U.S. economy contracted sharply, unemployment jumped 5%, and America's optimism fell.
E) U.S. GDP during the mid 1930s stood at levels much lower than 30 years later.
My take on this -
B states that some other action helped employ Americans and grow GDP... However, the argument states:
"Some political commentators and economic historians contend that President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal singlehandedly propelled the United States out of the Great Depression and into decades of uninterrupted prosperity."

The main difference between B and D is that B talks about adding jobs and growing GDP , but not about getting US out of great depression. There is a subtle difference here... between growing US economy and getting US out of depression.

D attacks the argument directly and thus is correct.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

by badpoem » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:11 pm
I chose B. What is the OA?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:20 am
Guys, check out the wording of the final sentence. "To support this claim, these economists..."

We can translate this as knowing the claim is BASED on 3 good things that happened after 1933: GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased.

What would WEAKEN the argument is that if that evidence, the basis of support for the claim, was taken away.

D is the correct answer because it says that just 6 years later these 3 things were actually WORSE. Therefore removing the standing on which the conclusion is based.

D more directly relates to the specificity of the argument. Also, to get nitty-gritty, 1939 is earlier than 1941 and would show that the New Deal had even LESS of an impact.

Furthermore, since B produced a positive result, helping Americans and growing GDP, you could argue that SO DID THE NEW DEAL. Who's to say that it was ONLY America's entry into WWII that caused the growth? Pre-1941 there could have still been (+) growth, so the argument is NOT WEAKENED necessarily.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:57 am
Thanked: 2 times

by sophiesaurabh » Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:29 am
VivianKerr wrote:Guys, check out the wording of the final sentence. "To support this claim, these economists..."

We can translate this as knowing the claim is BASED on 3 good things that happened after 1933: GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased.

What would WEAKEN the argument is that if that evidence, the basis of support for the claim, was taken away.

D is the correct answer because it says that just 6 years later these 3 things were actually WORSE. Therefore removing the standing on which the conclusion is based.

D more directly relates to the specificity of the argument. Also, to get nitty-gritty, 1939 is earlier than 1941 and would show that the New Deal had even LESS of an impact.

Furthermore, since B produced a positive result, helping Americans and growing GDP, you could argue that SO DID THE NEW DEAL. Who's to say that it was ONLY America's entry into WWII that caused the growth? Pre-1941 there could have still been (+) growth, so the argument is NOT WEAKENED necessarily.
Thanks Vivian.

I understand your point but my problem is with the word SINGLEHANDEDLY used in the conclusion and option (B) directly attacks this. It provides an alternate reason why after 1933 the GDP and employment grew. So a reason to choose this as an answer is that it shows that New Deal is not the only reason.
I konw this might not be the best option to choose but I do not like option (D) for the reason that it simply refutes the following statement by economists: -

"To support this claim, these economists note that during the years following 1933, GDP grew, unemployment shrunk, and optimism increased"

At best can we say that such an ambiguous question will not appear in the Test?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:33 am
Sophie, this really isn't an ambiguous question. In fact, I would say it is relatively straightforward one, and like many you might see on the test.

CR is testing not the implication of single words but the logic of entire arguments.

I would suggest writing down the Conclusion, Evidence & Assumptions as you practice CR to better hone in on what the BASIS for each argument is. Spend more time with the argument itself BEFORE reading the answer choices.

For a "weaken" question, the answer choice that MOST weakens the argument will always undermine the solid BASIS for the conclusion.

If you do not understand the argument first, then you will be tempted by the wrong answer choices that seem to relate to a small part of the premise. It's all about the bigger picture.

The word "singlehandedly" is a description of part of the conclusion. The CONCLUSION is not that the New Deal did it all by itself. The actual conclusion is that the New Deal was the CAUSE of all of this future prosperity. Notice how the supporting evidence tells us that this is the conclusion because it lists 3 things that would PROVE the New Deal = future prosperity. The evidence does NOT provide any basis to support a conclusion that "the New Deal did it all by itself with no other help." You're taking this one word and turning it into the entire argument, when in fact nothing else in the passage supports your inference.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)