Assumption CR

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

Assumption CR

by [email protected] » Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:39 pm
For-profit colleges serve far fewer students than either public or private non-profit colleges. At the same time, relative to non-profit colleges, for-profit colleges draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid, such as tuition grants and guaranteed loans, for their students. It must be true, then, that for-profit colleges enroll a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged students than do non-profit colleges.

The conclusion above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A] Public non-profit colleges and private non-profit colleges enroll a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged students.

B] For-profit colleges and private non-profit colleges enroll a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged students.

C] The number of students receiving federal and state financial aid at for-profit colleges is greater than the number of students receiving federal and state financial aid at non-profit colleges.

D] For-Profit colleges are of similar educational quality as non-profit colleges.

E] The majority of students at for-profit colleges do not default on repayment of their loans after they complete college.


The OA is B.


I thought the answer was E. Clearly what is wrong with the option E.

If you negate option E then you find the conclusion to get affected....\

Options B and E are both good answers...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 9:08 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by scholardream » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:21 am
Underneath is how I tackle the question, but it took me nearly 3 minutes to complete:
Premises: For-profit colleges have total different share of fin aid compared to non-profit colleges
Conclusion: For-profit colleges enroll a greater proportion of Fin disadv students
Assumption: more share of fin aid -> more fin disadv students
(A) This doesn't provide information to compared non-profit and for-profit -> eliminated
(B) This is the answer: for instant, For-profit colleges serve 2000 students, non-profit ones serve 20000 students, even the NUMBER of financially disadvantaged students in non-profit = for-profit, the proportion of fin disadv students in for-profit is greater than that in non-profit
(C) This repeats the premise "At the same time, relative to non-profit colleges, for-profit colleges draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid, such as tuition grants and guaranteed loans, for their students" -> eliminated
(D) Out of scope. No educational quality was discussed in the paragraph
(E) This assumption doesn't help tackle the Conclusion. For instant, 10% of 1000 is bigger than 90% of 100. -> eliminated

Could you guide me a more time saver way ?