BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Johnson

Expert replies

by hypik21 » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:37 pm
B imo...A is too extreme...since the paragraph says Johnson's text is "more faithful", I assume it is less distorted..later in the paragraph it states that the dash that Johnson printed IMPLIES something that Dickinson never meant..in other words, to mislead.
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:25 am
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions. The seroiusness of distortions is no where discussed.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions. True but it doesn't capture the main point. True .
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. Can't be main point.
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. Thoroughness is not talked of in the given passage.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts. True

Now between B and E

Option B - This is the reason that is put forth to show that Johnson has distoted the poetry

Option E - This is the reason put forth to show that Johnson and other editors have failed to decipher few things in the poetry that led to distotion of the poetry. We only know that Johnson has distoted because of problem in deciphering a punctuation mark but we do not know the reason for other editors. For this reason 'E' should be incorrect.

Option B in all probability should be the right answer.

Expert comments most welcome...

[/b]
Join the discussion

Re: Johnson

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:27 am
Musicolo wrote:This is the main issue with regard to GMAT which must be changed. Here we are discussing which is the correct answer and yet we can not agree on it. And we are supposed to find the correct answer in two minutes when taking the actual test.
Who comes up with these idiotic questions? Are we supposedly smarter or with higher level of logical thinking if we get this question right?
The only person who knows these answers is the person who came up with this questions. Now, Id like to see him/her and see what they are doing for living (other then this) and how much money are they making!!! Probably sitting somewhere in some dark room, being overweight, secluded from any form of social life, coming up with these idiotic questions....I wish GMAT did not exist.
:)
First, note that this is NOT an official GMAT question - it looks like it comes from the CR 1000 set, which has provided many a questionable question in the past.

Questions on the actual GMAT are vetted very carefully. The main reason that it's so expensive to write the GMAT is because of the insanely high cost of creating and testing new questions. Every question you see on Test Day has been checked, double checked, triple checked and quadruple checked to eliminate ambiguity and maintain consistency with previous GMAT questions.

So, here's the takeaway from this particular question: don't worry about it. You have a number of experts disagreeing about the validity of a "made up" question from a questionable source. Another takeaway: beware of random questions you find on the Internet; know which sources you can trust and which you can't.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by agautam » Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:46 pm
the reason i think E is wrong is because of "OFTEN" in the prompt does not mean "ALWAYS" and E sounds like "have failed to deal adequately" they have always failed.

makes sense?
Join the discussion