Peter and John

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:37 am
At 10:00 a.m., Peter begins traveling on a certain bike path from Riverdale at a constant rate of 10 mph. If, at 2:00 p.m., John begins traveling from Riverdale on the same path at a constant rate of 15 mph, at what time will he catch up to Peter?

A)6:00 p.m.
B)6:30 p.m.
C)8:00 p.m.
D)8:30 p.m.
E)10:00 p.m.
From 10am to 2pm, the distance traveled by Peter in 4 hours = rt = 10*4 = 40 miles.

The CATCH-UP RATE is equal to the DIFFERENCE between John's rate and Peter's rate:
15-10 = 5 miles per hour.
Since John travels 15 miles per hour, while Peter travels 10 miles per hour, every hour John catches up by 5 miles.

Time for John to catch up 40 miles = (catch-up distance)/(catch-up rate) = 40/5 = 8 hours.
Since John starts to travel at 2pm, the time at which he catches up to Peter = 2pm + 8 hours = 10pm.

The correct answer is E.

Alternate approach:

From 10am to 2pm, the distance traveled by Peter in 4 hours = rt = 10*4 = 40 miles.
Every hour Peter travels 10 more miles, while John travels 15 miles.
To determine when John catches up to Peter, WRITE OUT the total distance that each has traveled, hour by hour.

2pm:
Peter = 40 miles, John = 0 miles.
3pm:
Peter = 40+10 = 50 miles, John = 0+15 = 15 miles.
4pm:
Peter = 50+10 = 60 miles, John = 15+15 = 30 miles.
5pm:
Peter = 60+10 = 70 miles, John = 30+15 = 45 miles.
6pm:
Peter = 70+10 = 80 miles, John = 45+15 = 60 miles.
7pm:
Peter = 80+10 = 90 miles, John = 60+15 = 75 miles.
8pm:
Peter = 90+10 = 100 miles, John = 75+15 = 90 miles.
9pm:
Peter = 100+10 = 110 miles, John = 90+15 = 105 miles.
10pm:
Peter = 110+10 = 120 miles, John = 105+15 = 120 miles.

The correct answer is E.

Similar problems:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/rates-work-t119850.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/dune-buggie-t108778.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/interesting- ... 16571.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/rate-problem-t111575.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/rate-problem-t111575.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/p-and-q-circ ... 22287.html (GMAT Prep)
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:44 am
Thanked: 2 times

by didieravoaka » Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:44 pm
Thanks Mitch for the answers and for the similar problems. But tell me, is it that rule that you use in he first approach...
"When elements compete, determine the difference between the rates"?
Thanks.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:06 pm
didieravoaka wrote:Thanks Mitch for the answers and for the similar problems. But tell me, is it that rule that you use in he first approach...
"When elements compete, determine the difference between the rates"?
Thanks.
I'd think of it as "when one person/thing is trying to catch another, treat the rate as Faster Thing - Slower Thing".

Similarly, when two things/people are traveling TOWARD each other or working together, treat the rate as Thing 1 + Thing 2.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:44 am
Thanked: 2 times

by didieravoaka » Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:08 pm
Thanks Matt. I'd think the same way.