BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inflammation/fever

Expert replies
by eustudent » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:21 pm
Hi,
This problem has been posted before, however, I cannot quite get the explanations given. Can someone attempt to explain to me a bit more clearly than the previos posts?!

When 1,000 children were inoculated with a certain vaccine, some developed inflammation at the site of the inoculation and some developed fever. How many of the children developed inflammation but not fever ?

(1) 880 children developed neither inflammation nor fever
(2) 20 children developed fever
So, We have Inflamation (I)
Fever (F)
I+F+Neither- Both= Grand total.
We have
880(neither)+20(fever)+ I(unknown)- Both(unknown)=1000
I=?
Answer is C.I must have missed something because I cannot find the value of the children that have Both.
Please help.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Matmasi » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:35 pm
Hi,

how you wrote we need to apply this formula:
I+ F + Neither - Both = Grand total
But first, let's clarify what we are looking for.
We are asked to find the number of child who developed inflammation but not fever.
This is equal to the number of children who got an inflammation minus the number of children who got inflammation + fever.
In other words, if you have 4 guys with inflammation and 2 of them have also fever, the number of guys with just inflammation is 4-2=2.

So:

Inflammation - I
Fever - F

Total = F + I - Both (I+F) + Neither (I+F)

Statements 1 & 2 are clearly insufficient alone.

Combining 1 & 2

1000 = 20 + (I - Both (I+F)) + 880

I - Both (I+F) = 100

Sufficient.

Best regards
Join the discussion

by eustudent » Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:58 pm
I understand what you mean, but I still do not feel confident that we have the number of people who have both.

I am aware of this formula, but this is where I lose the line of reasoning.
GT= Group 1+ Group 2+ Neither Group- Both groups.
GT= 1000
NG= 880
G1(F)= 20
G2(I)= ?
BG=?
So, I have two unknowns, 1st is the Inflamation and 2nd is Both Groups?
or 1000- 880=120; 120 is both groups?
Because I cannot have two unknown, I put E as an answer. I mean considering both, I still can't get to the solution.
Please help, because I always score badly on this type DS qusetions!
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:11 pm
answer should be 'E'. We have two unknowns and it is not possible to calculate the value of people having inflammation but not fever.
Join the discussion

by Matmasi » Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:10 am
OK, try to imagine:
There is a group of 10 people.
4 are not sick, so don't have fever or iflammation.
4 have inflammation
4 have fever.
You see the the sum is 12? but we have 10 people..
This happens because someone of them has inflammation and has also fever.

in fact 2 have both inflammation and fever.
So, the number of people who ONLY got inflammation and NOT fever is equal to the number of people who got inflammation less the number of people that got both.

And to answer to mehravikas, your reasoning is wrong because the question is NOT asking the value of I, but the value of I-(BothI&F).
Join the discussion

hmm

by JeffB » Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:31 am
Overlapping Sets Charts.
Attachments
Book1.xlsx
(10.74 KiB) Downloaded 168 times
Last edited by JeffB on Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

Answer is C

by iamaneophyte » Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:32 am
Out of 1000 people, 880 didn't get affected either with inflammation or fever. So the remaining children are 120.

These are the children who are affected with inflammation or fever or both.

With fever alone is 20 and so remaining would be 100.

Hope this helps!
neophyte
Join the discussion

Re: hmm

by mehravikas » Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:13 pm
thanks...
JeffB wrote:Overlapping Sets Charts.
Join the discussion