New types of washing

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

New types of washing

by madhur_ahuja » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:44 pm
New types of washing machines designed to consume less energy also extract less water from laundry during their final spin cycles than do washing machines that consume somewhat more energy. The wetter the laundry, the more energy required to dry it in an automatic dryer. Thus using these new types of washing machines could result in an overall increase in the energy needed to wash and dry a load of laundry.

In which one of the following is the pattern of reasoning most parallel to that in the argument above?

(A) The more skill required to operate a machine, the harder it is to find
people able to do it, and thus the more those people must be paid. Therefore, if a factory installs machines that require highly skilled operators, it must be prepared to pay higher wages.

(B) There are two routes between Centerville and Mapletown, and the scenic route is the longer route. Therefore, a person who is not concerned with how long it will take to travel between Centerville and Mapletown will probably take the scenic route.

(C) The more people who work in the library’s reading room, the noisier the room becomes; and the noisier the working environment, the less efficiently people work. Therefore, when many people are working in the reading room, those people are working less efficiently.

(D) Pine is a less expensive wood than cedar but is more susceptible to rot. Outdoor furniture made from wood susceptible to rot must be painter with more expensive paint. Therefore, building outdoor furniture from pine rather than cedar could increase the total cost of building and painting the furniture.

(E) The more weights added to an exercise machine, the greater the muscle strength needed to work out on the machine. Up to a point, using more muscle strength can make a person stronger. Thus an exercise machine with more weights can, but does not necessarily, make a person stronger
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Spring2009 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:24 pm
I think D.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by bignasty666 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:43 am
D for sure......

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Spring2009 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:29 am
bignasty666 wrote:D for sure......
What is your reason for choosing D?
I chose D just because of feeling. No clear reason.
Btw, is this kind of question official in GMAT?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by bignasty666 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:42 am
Spring2009 wrote:
bignasty666 wrote:D for sure......
What is your reason for choosing D?
I chose D just because of feeling. No clear reason.
Btw, is this kind of question official in GMAT?
more of a lsat q...not seen one like this on the gmat..

Reasom for choosing is same as urs.. besides this is the only option that seems similar to the stem..I wouldnt spend too much time studying this type of q

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Indy
Thanked: 3 times

by amazonviper » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:10 pm
Nice question. Still I want to know the reasoning behind these type of questions. I am having a hard time getting these right. :cry:
__________________________________

Winners never quit..Quitters never win !!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:45 am
Thanked: 2 times

D

by sumank8216 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:31 pm
D

Reasoning

Premise 1 :- one positive point , one negative point
premise2 :- reasoning for the neg point
conclusion: based on both the premises.

D : follows the same logic
premise 1: 1 positive (less expensive) , 1 negative (susceptible to rot)
premise 2: why rot wood is not good .
conclusion based on both the premises;that this less expensve wood is not good for housing.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:50 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: New types of washing

by ogbeni » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:59 pm
Option D

1. New WM are meant to lower energy consumption
2. However New WM extract less water, resulting in longer cycles to dry (unstated assumption), which eventually negates the original intent

So NW --> Lower Energy Consumption but when all said and done NW --> Increases Energy Consumption

Let's look at D
1. Pine is susceptible to rot but is less expensive (less expensive is the benefit to take not off = equivalent of lowering energy consumption in the stimulus.
2. Outdoor furniture made from wood susceptible to rot must be painted with more expensive paint (opposite of less expensive goal for going with Pine in the first place). Therefore, building outdoor furniture from pine rather than cedar could increase the total cost of building and painting the furniture. (Bingo - the original intent is eventually negated because of a factor inherent in the original intent)

The only other option that comes a mile close is E. Key thing to these types of question is to not be intimidated. Focus on getting the reasoning and then attack the options

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:48 pm
OA is D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:46 pm
I am pretty sure that the right Answer is D