BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

animals in the zoo

Expert replies
by mehrasa » Fri Oct 07, 2011 9:15 am
A zoo has w wildebeests, y yaks, z zebras, and no other animals. If an animal is chosen
at random from the zoo, is the probability of choosing a yak greater than the
probability of choosing a zebra?

1) y/w+z>1/2
2) z/w+y<1/2

could you please give me the solution mathematically when we consider both stats.. i need some clarification on inequality problem..thnx
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shankar.ashwin » Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:03 am
From (1)

y/w+z>1/2

(w+z)/y < 2 (Taking inverse inequality changes)

(w+y+z)/y < 3 (Adding 1 and taking LCM)

y/(w+y+z) > 1/3 (Again taking inverse)

Now similarly from (2) we have;

z/(w+y+z) < 1/3.

Hence P(y) > P(z) C
Join the discussion

by sl750 » Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:27 am
The question can be rephrased as , is y>z ?

Statement 1
y/w+z>1/2
y>(w+z)/2 Insufficient

Statement 2
z/w+y<1/2
z<(w+y)/2 Insufficient

Statement 1 and 2

As the inequalities are pointing in opposite directions, we can subtract the two, notice that
there are two scenarios, in one case, y>z and in the other y<z
y-z>(w+z)/2-(w+y)/2. simplifying, we get y>z
z-y<(w+y)/2-(w+z)/2. simplifying, we get y>z Sufficient
Join the discussion

by bijoyajj » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:28 am
mehrasa wrote:A zoo has w wildebeests, y yaks, z zebras, and no other animals. If an animal is chosen
at random from the zoo, is the probability of choosing a yak greater than the
probability of choosing a zebra?

1) y/w+z>1/2
2) z/w+y<1/2

could you please give me the solution mathematically when we consider both stats.. i need some clarification on inequality problem..thnx
I dont know if this question really has solution.. Since we are dealing with animals, here only +ve integers comes into the picture..

Statement 1 is insufficient as it can take any values and equation still be fine
Statement 2:- this only works if y=0, and z<w/2 .. Again this statement is insufficient

Going by algebra, we can get proove that y>z, but then z needs to be -ve (as per the statement 2)..

Let me know if i am getting it wrong..
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:11 am
mehrasa wrote:A zoo has w wildebeests, y yaks, z zebras, and no other animals. If an animal is chosen
at random from the zoo, is the probability of choosing a yak greater than the
probability of choosing a zebra?

1) y/w+z>1/2
2) z/w+y<1/2

could you please give me the solution mathematically when we consider both stats.. i need some clarification on inequality problem..thnx
Almost no math is needed when we combine the two statements.
Linking them together, we get:
z/(w+y) < 1/2 < y/(w+z)
z/(w+y) < y/(w+z).

The inequality above compares the following ratios:
zebras : other animals < yaks : other animals.

Clearly, for the relationship above to hold true, there must be fewer zebras than yaks.
SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is C.

Looking for an algebraic proof will only make the problem take LONGER.
Remember: the GMAT is not a math test; it's a REASONING test.

This problem is similar to the following from GMATPrep:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/probability-t74040.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion