BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x is an integer, then x(x – 1)(x – k)

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 1:40 am
Thanked: 3 times
by Needgmat » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:12 am
If x is an integer, then x(x - 1)(x - k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A) -4
B) -2
C) -1
D) 2
E) 5

OAB

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

Kavin
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 04, 2016 5:28 am
Needgmat wrote:If x is an integer, then x(x - 1)(x - k) must be evenly divisible by three when k is any of the following values EXCEPT

A) -4
B) -2
C) -1
D) 2
E) 5
We can PLUG IN THE ANSWERS, which represent the value of k.

Since the goal is show that (x)(x-1)(x-k) does NOT have to be divisible by 3, let x=5, with the result that x and x-1 will each not be divisible by 3:
(x)(x-1)(x-k) = (5)(5-1)(5-k) = (5)(4)(5-k).
When the correct answer choice is plugged in, (5)(4)(5-k) will NOT be divisible by 3.

A: k=-4
Here, (5)(4)(5-k) = (5)(4)(9).
The resulting product is a multiple of 3.

B: k=-2
Here, (5)(4)(5-k) = (5)(4)(7).
The resulting product is NOT a multiple of 3.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 1:40 am
Thanked: 3 times

by Needgmat » Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:43 am
Since the goal is show that (x)(x-1)(x-k) does NOT have to be divisible by 3, let x=5, with the result that x and x-1 will each not be divisible by 3:
(x)(x-1)(x-k) = (5)(5-1)(5-k) = (5)(4)(5-k).
When the correct answer choice is plugged in, (5)(4)(5-k) will NOT be divisible by 3.
Hi GMATGuruNY ,

Thank you so much for your explanation.

Just a quick question, is there any particular reason to take x=5 or I can take any number, which is not divisible by 3?

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

Kavin
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pmFollowed by: 511 members
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:56 am
Hi Needgmat,

This question is based on the exact same concept as an OG question:

OG13/GMAT2015 PS #87
GMAT2016 PS #106
GMAT2017 PS #119

When dealing with 3 consecutive integers, exactly one of the 3 will be divisible by the number 3:

eg
1, 2, 3
2, 3, 4
3, 4, 5
4, 5, 6
5, 6, 7
Etc.

Thus, when multiplying 3 consecutive integers, we'll end up with a product that is divisible by 3 (since there will be at least one 3 in the prime-factorization of that product). In this prompt, we have (X) and (X-1), so we know that we have two consecutive integers. However, we don't know whether one of those two is the one that's divisible by 3 or if they're the two numbers that are not (and the third value is the one that's divisibly by 3.

IF... the third term was either (X+1) or (X-2), then we'd be guaranteed to have 3 consecutive integers...

(X+1)(X)(X-1)

or

(X)(X-1)(X-2)

Those are not the only options though. Any term that is "3 away" from the third term would ALSO be a multiple of 3.

eg.

1, 2, 3
1, 2, 6
1, 2, 9

6, 7, 8
3, 7, 8
9, 7, 8
Etc.

So instead of (X+1) and (X-2) we could have...

(X+4)
(X+7)
(X+10)
Etc.

(X-2)
(X-5)
(X-8)
Etc.

Knowing that pattern, it doesn't take much work to find the correct answer...

Final Answer: B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:11 am
Needgmat wrote:Hi GMATGuruNY ,

Thank you so much for your explanation.

Just a quick question, is there any particular reason to take x=5 or I can take any number, which is not divisible by 3?
The goal is to show that (x)(x-1)(x-k) does NOT have to be divisible by 3.
To this end, we can test any integer for x such that neither x nor x-1 will be divisible by 3.
I tested x=5 because it is greater than or equal to all of the answer choices, with the result that 5-k will be nonnegative in every case.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pmFollowed by: 119 members
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:42 pm
Needgmat wrote: Just a quick question, is there any particular reason to take x=5 or I can take any number, which is not divisible by 3?
It might be easiest to think about remainders when dividing by 3. Integers fall into three groups when divided by 3:

Remainder 0: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, ...
Remainder 1: 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, ...
Remainder 2: 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ...

So if you're multiplying three numbers together, you know that one of them will be divisible by three if you have each possible remainder represented.

For instance, suppose I have an integer x, and I don't know its remainder by 3. I know that (x - 1) will have a different remainder from x, and I also know that (x - 4) will have the SAME remainder as (x - 1), because (x - 1) and (x - 4) differ by 3 and hence appear in the same remainder group. So if I do

x * (x - 4)

I know I have two remainders represented.

Now all I need is the third remainder (which could be (x - 2) or (x - 5) or (x - 8), etc.) and I'm set! I know I'll have SOME integer that divides by 3.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1