BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is |p| =

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Tue May 18, 2010 5:12 am
Is |p| = q - r?
(1) p + q = r.
(2) p < 0.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by raviki8208 » Tue May 18, 2010 8:37 am
sanju09 wrote:Is |p| = q - r?
(1) p + q = r.
(2) p < 0.
using 1 alone,
p = r - q so not sufficient

using 2 alone,
p r q relation is not known.

uisng both
if p < 0, |p| = -p so,
|p| ≠ q - r so, sufficient .. Answer is C
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Tue May 18, 2010 8:41 am
(1) p+q=r, rewritten is;

p=q-r

Both side have to be positive or negative. It can't be that both sides have opposite signs. Thus,

If q-r is negative, lpl does not equal q-r.

If q-r is postive, then lpl=q-r.

Thus, (1) insufficient.

(2) p<0. This doesn't say anything about q or r. Thus, (2) insufficent.

Put them together, because p<0, q-r must also be negative. Thus lpl does not equal q-r. Thus,

IMO the answer is C.

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by November Rain » Tue May 18, 2010 9:40 am
IMO A

If |p| = q - r it means that either p = q - r or (-p) = q - r

Statement 1 tell us that p + q = r -> p = r - q -> - p = q - r

Sufficient.


Statment B does not tell us anything. Insufficient
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Tue May 18, 2010 9:49 am
November Rain wrote:IMO A

If |p| = q - r it means that either p = q - r or (-p) = q - r

Statement 1 tell us that p + q = r -> p = r - q -> - p = q - r

Sufficient.


Statment B does not tell us anything. Insufficient
(1) is not sufficient because what if r-q is negative? It couldn't possibly be equal lpl. (1) does not tell us that r-q is not negative. It tells us it is equal to p. P could be negative. Therefore, r-q could be negative, at which point r-q could not equal an absolute value because absolute values are always positive.
Join the discussion

by thinkpanther » Tue May 18, 2010 10:25 am
IMO C


1) p + q = r

p = r-q

by definition of absolute value

when p is +ve |p| = p and when p is -ve |p| = -p

so insufficient

2) p <0 insufficient

combined:

|p| = -p = q-r hence sufficient
Join the discussion

by November Rain » Tue May 18, 2010 10:36 am
IMO A

If |p| = q - r it means that either p = q - r or (-p) = q - r

Statement 1 tell us that p + q = r -> p = r - q -> - p = q - r

Sufficient.


Statment B does not tell us anything. Insufficient
(1) is not sufficient because what if r-q is negative? It couldn't possibly be equal lpl. (1) does not tell us that r-q is not negative. It tells us it is equal to p. P could be negative. Therefore, r-q could be negative, at which point r-q could not equal an absolute value because absolute values are always positive.
Yes, you're right. I missed that possibility.
Join the discussion

by nikhilkatira » Sun Jun 27, 2010 12:39 am
What is the OA ?
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:32 am
nikhilkatira wrote:What is the OA ?

When each statement alone is not clicking, we then take p = r - q, which is negative, cannot equal an absolute value; but q - r could.

[spoiler]C the OA[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion