BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In a certain sport, teams receive 3 points for each win ...

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vinay1983 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:06 am
I assessed it this way:

Statement 1: L team has 8 points, that is 2 wins and 2 draws.But there is no information about the other team's scores. Insufficient.

Statement 2. Total points is 23. This can be arrived at by many combination of scores. no information about the distribution of score is given. Insufficient.

Combining 1 & 2:
L has 8 points out of 23. i.e the remaining teams distribute 15 points among themselves.

Suppose if all matches were tied then the score would have been 2*10=20 and suppose all matches were win matches 3*10=30.

Then to score 23 points we would need 3 matches to be won in total and seven drawn matches.(If u can draw a table with this combination)

Wins Draws Total
10 0 30
9 1 29 and so on

L has won 2, then only 1 other team could have won this match.However, all the teams would have scored less than 8.

Sufficient L is the leader.
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:12 pm
Hi gmmattesttaker2,

Vinay1983 did a nice job of breaking down the possibilities (and it's exactly how I would have done it); this approach serves as a great way to tackle certain Quant questions.

This DS question is a bit tougher than the typical GMAT DS question that would test the concept, but it serves as a good example of what's called "limited options." In these types of questions, STARING is NOT an option. To solve this question quickly, you MUST take some notes and "map out" the possibilities.

For example, since there are 5 teams, there are ONLY 10 total games played (you have to take the time to figure that out)

With each game...
It's either a Win for one and a Loss for another = 3 + 0 = 3 pts
OR it's a Tie for one and a Tie for another = 1 + 1 = 2 pts

You have to also take the time to figure that out.

Be prepared to figure things out on Test Day. It's one of the skills that helps to lead to high scores on the GMAT.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion