BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Positive integer k

Expert replies
by success1111 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:53 pm
The positive integer K has exactly two positive prime factors 3 and 7.If K has a total of 6 positive factors including 1 and K,WHAT IS THE VALUE OF k?

1)3^2 is a factor of k

2) 7^2 is not a factor of k
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bluementor » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:48 am
Since we know k has exactly 7 and 3 as prime factors, we can summarize as follows:

k = (3^x)(7^y) , where x and y are positive integers.

we also know that k has exactly 6 different positive factors. so,

6 = (x+1)(y+1)

we need to know the values of x and y to evaluate k.

Statement 1: 3^2 is a factor of k

If 3^2 = 3^x, then x=2. In this case, y must equal to 1.

If x = 3 (or 4), then y will not be an integer.
If x = 5, then y will be 0. This case is also not possible since we know y must be at least 1 (because 7 is a known factor of k).

Therefore, the only possible value for x is 2. And from this we can conclude that y can only be 1. Sufficient.

Statement 2: 7^2 is not a factor of k

Therefore, y cannot be larger than 1. And since y must at least be 1 (because 7 is a known factor of k), we can conclude that y = 1. And from this we can determine x = 2. Sufficient.

Choose D.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by gdsurdy » Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:07 am
I am not sure if I understood the question correctly. It says K has exactly two +ve prime factors 3 and 7. It has 6 factors in all including 1 and K.

Doesn't this interpret to the 6 factors being 1, 3, 7, _ , _ and K.

If we look at the question this way the answer would be E.
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:59 am
Hi Blue Mnetor,

If 3^2 = 3^x, then x=2. In this case, y must equal to 1.

but if 3^2 is a factor 3
and for this case

x =1 y=3

so we get two different value of x, then HOW COME 1 IS SUFF?
PLEASE HELP.
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:48 pm
gdsurdy wrote:I am not sure if I understood the question correctly. It says K has exactly two +ve prime factors 3 and 7. It has 6 factors in all including 1 and K.

Doesn't this interpret to the 6 factors being 1, 3, 7, _ , _ and K.

If we look at the question this way the answer would be E.

FYI,this a GMATPREP question.It is a clue for you to know much more about number properties because they come in different disguise.

BM,thanks a lot for your input but i am still having trouble on how your arrive at your answer.

Cubic,thanks a well.

Experts, i need help on this question.
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:01 pm
Let me take a stab at this one.

The number of factors a number has is based on the prime factorization of a number.

Let’s say we have a number x.
The prime factorization of x= p^2 * p^2. The number of factors of x would be (3)(3)=9.

The rule is if x= p^n * q^m and p and q are prime, then it has (n+1)(m+1) factors.

So looking at this question we know that k has two prime factors 3 and 7. Also, we know that k has a total of 6 factors.

K can be 3^2 * 7^1 (remember we need to have 6 total factors and (2+1)(1+1)=6).

K can also be 3^1 * 7^2.


So let’s look at the statements.

1)3^2 is a factor of k
Well this is sufficient because as I stated above we only have 2 possibilities and only one has 3^2 as a factor. So K = 3^2 *7^1.

Suff

2) 7^2 is not a factor of k

This is also sufficient because we know 7^2 isn’t a factor, so 3^2 * 7^1 must equal k.

Suff

Choose D
Join the discussion

by lilu » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:01 pm
Good explanation by DaveGill (MGMAT forum)
https://www.manhattangmat.net.in/forums/post11734.html
The more you look, the more you see.
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:15 am
cubicle_bound_misfit wrote:
but if 3^2 is a factor 3
and for this case

x =1 y=3
CBM, I'm not sure I understand how you arrived at this. 3^2 cannot be a factor of 3. So this case is not valid.

In any case, dmateer25 has explained the theory behind this problem. Post back if something still bothers you.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by success1111 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 8:02 pm
Yeah. OA is D.
Thanks everyone for your contribution.
Trust but verify.
Join the discussion

by Winner2013 » Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:09 pm
I have a doubt about this question and need some help. I guess this doubt is really stupid but still I would appreciate if someone can help.

The question clearly says that the number k has exactly 2 positive prime factors - 3 and 7. now for 63- after factorization we get

63= 3*3*7

so we have 3 prime factors here right? - 3,3,7. Then how does the question say only 2 prime factors and the answer comes out to be 63?

am i interpreting the question in a wrong way? if a prime factor(3) is repeated as in case of 63, what do we say about how many prime factors does the number have?

please help.

thanks,
Pooja
Join the discussion

by Winner2013 » Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:04 pm
Can someone help me with this doubt posted by me in previous post? Experts please help

Thanks,
Pooja
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:04 pm
Hi Pooja,

When a question discusses the number of "prime factors" in an integer, then duplicates don't count.

For example, then number 21 and 63 have the same prime factors: 3 and 7. While 63 has "another 3", factoring (and prime factoring) questions don't count the duplicates.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 03, 2014 4:29 pm
Good question! By "prime factors", this question means "unique prime factors". This implication is VERY common on math tests and should probably be assumed unless there's a real reason to suspect otherwise.

Another detail here: if a number has exactly six factors, it MUST have either 5 identical prime factors (and no others), or 2 of prime factor p and 1 of prime factor q, where p is not equal to q. So from that deduction alone you would be able to catch the (admittedly imprecise) implication mentioned above.
Winner2013 wrote:I have a doubt about this question and need some help. I guess this doubt is really stupid but still I would appreciate if someone can help.

The question clearly says that the number k has exactly 2 positive prime factors - 3 and 7. now for 63- after factorization we get

63= 3*3*7

so we have 3 prime factors here right? - 3,3,7. Then how does the question say only 2 prime factors and the answer comes out to be 63?

am i interpreting the question in a wrong way? if a prime factor(3) is repeated as in case of 63, what do we say about how many prime factors does the number have?

please help.

thanks,
Pooja
Join the discussion

by Winner2013 » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:05 pm
Thank you Matt and Rich.

Your explanations were really helpful.

Pooja
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:21 am
success1111 wrote:The positive integer K has exactly two positive prime factors 3 and 7.If K has a total of 6 positive factors including 1 and K,WHAT IS THE VALUE OF k?

1)3^2 is a factor of k

2) 7^2 is not a factor of k
A Rule with Example:

If K = 3^a.7^b, a, b ≠ 0, then K would have a total of (a + 1) (b + 1) number of factors, including 1 and K. So, if K has a total of 6 positive factors including 1 and K, then the possibilities are that either K = 3^1.7^2 or K = 3^2.7^1. So this is what we have to look to while testing the statements.

(1) If 3^2 is a factor of K, then K must be equal to 3^2.7^1 only. Sufficient

(2) If 7^2 is not a factor of K, then it must be that 7^1 is a factor of K, hence K must be equal to 3^2.7^1 only. [spoiler]Sufficient

Pick D
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion