BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmatprep probability

Expert replies
by warraich » Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:04 pm
Jar contains only Black b, white w and red r marbles. One marble chosen at random. Is the probability marble chosen would be red greater than the proablity that the marble chosen will be white.

1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
2) b - w > r
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vineeshp » Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:11 pm
Expert solution is already available on the site.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/marbles-prob ... 32705.html
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:22 pm
IMO A
Asked whether r/(b+w+r) > w/(b+w+r)?

1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)

we know that b,r, and w are positive, so

lets inverse the inequality
(b+w)/r < (b+r)/w (sign changed)

Adding 1 on both side we get,
[(b+w)/r] +1 < [(b+r)/w] +1
(b+w+r)/r < (b+w+r)/w

Inverse the inequality again.

r/(b+w+r) > w/(b+w+r) , Sufficient.

2) b - w > r

from this statement we only know that b> r+w , which does not give any relation between r and w. Insufficient.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:34 pm
warraich wrote:Jar contains only Black b, white w and red r marbles. One marble chosen at random. Is the probability marble chosen would be red greater than the proablity that the marble chosen will be white.

1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
2) b - w > r
Almost no math is needed.

Statement 1: r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
Tells us that the ratio of red to the other colors (blue and white) is greater than the ratio of white to the other colors (blue and red).
In other words, there are more red marbles than white marbles.
Sufficient.

Statement 2: b-w > r.
Rephrased, b > w+r.
No way to determine whether there are more red marbles than white marbles.
Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by cans » Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:43 pm
b,w,r balls. total=b+w+r
prob(red) = r/(b+w+r) ; prob(white) = w/(b+w+r)
to find if r/(b+w+r) > w/(b+w+r)
cross multiply:- rb+wr + rr > wb+ww+wr. cancelling wr,
r(b+r) > w(b+w)
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r) (To find)
a) above statement is given. Thus sufficient.
b) b-w>r not sufficient. (we need to find if r>w. no information)
IMO A
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion