I think the answer should be (C)
1. Lets look at the first case:
3x-3y = 1
so : 3(x-y) = 1
so: x-y = 1/3
I can come up with a pair of values that satisfy this equation either ways:
x = 1, y = 2/3 (both x and y are non negative)
or
x = -1/3 and y = -2/3
Both yield the same result in the equation so INSUFFICIENT
2. Lets look at the second case:
x/y < 1
so: x < y
Lets try two cases again......
Let's look at the same figures as above. In the second case x > y , i.e -1/3 is greater than -2/3. We can also have a whole range of positive integers that satisfy this equation.... so INSUFFICIENT...
3. Now lets use both:
first statement says that x - y is positive so if x < y as per statement 2, they both cannot be of the same sign. Hence statement is SUFFICIENT..
so.... Ans (C)
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Are x and y both negative numbers
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
IMO E
Statement one says X > Y Not Sufficient
Statement two says X > Y if Y is negative and X < Y if Y I positive - Not Sufficient
Taking both the statement together Y has to be negative. Does X have to be negative too?
Values X = [spoiler]2/9[/spoiler] and Y = [spoiler]-1/9[/spoiler] Satisfy both conditions.
Also Values X = [spoiler]-1/9[/spoiler] and Y = [spoiler]-4/9[/spoiler] satisfy both conditoins.
Statement one says X > Y Not Sufficient
Statement two says X > Y if Y is negative and X < Y if Y I positive - Not Sufficient
Taking both the statement together Y has to be negative. Does X have to be negative too?
Values X = [spoiler]2/9[/spoiler] and Y = [spoiler]-1/9[/spoiler] Satisfy both conditions.
Also Values X = [spoiler]-1/9[/spoiler] and Y = [spoiler]-4/9[/spoiler] satisfy both conditoins.
Hey Chufus,chufus wrote:I think the answer should be (C)
2. Lets look at the second case:
x/y < 1
so: x < y
This is wrong. You can't mulitply or divide variables in inequalities unless you know the sign of the variable. Look at ripulgupta's explanation.
My journey towards the MBA: https://theroadlesstravellled.blocked/
-
Brian@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1031
- Location: Malibu, CA
- Thanked: 716 times
- GMAT Score:750
ripulgupta nailed it, and prodizy made a great point, too.
Here the question is asking if they're BOTH negative. Statement 1 gives us a nice algebraic start, becuase if you factor the 3:
3x - 3y = 1
3(x-y) = 1
(x - y) = 1/3
You get that the difference is 1/3, which could be done via either:
2/3 - 1/3 (both positive ---> NO)
or
-1/3 - (-2/3) (both negative ---> YES)
Statement 2 is clearly not sufficient on its own. 1/2 satisfies statement 2 and gives a clear NO, but -1/-2 also works and gives the answer YES.
Taking them together, we still have the possibility for YES when we use:
x = -1/3 and y = -2/3, because -1/3 / -2/3 is 1/2.
Note that what statement 2 adds is that y must have a greater absolute value if they share the same sign, but that they can have different signs, too.
Perhaps the quickest way to show that they don't have to both be negative is to consider 0 (ever a gamechanging number). If x is 0 and y = -1/3, both statements are satisfied and the answer is NO, as 0 is neither negative nor positive.
____________________________________________________
I like this question as a demonstration of your job when picking numbers, which is to "prove insufficiency". The question wants you to see that two positives don't work, because in that case x is always the larger number (to satisfy statement 1) and that means that statement 2 is not satisfied. But you can have one negative and one positive (as ripulgupta had) or x zero and y negative, and then you don't have two negatives. The GMAT here thinks that you'll only try two positives when you're assessing choice C, realize that that doesn't work, and assume that they both have to be negative. But the creative folks win out here - those of us who try like crazy to get the opposite answer (NO, when YES may have come a bit easier) will win out.
____________________________
And to prodizy's comment about Chufus' post, whenever you see an inequality in a DS problem you should immediately have your senses heightened - there's a 90-some-% chance that the GMAT is setting you up for that "can't multiply/divide by a negative without changing the sign" rule. Their favorite way to do that is by making you multiply/divide a variable and not a known number; that way they can sneak that negative past you. If you see an inequality, immediately start thinking about the potential for variables to be negative!!!!!
Here the question is asking if they're BOTH negative. Statement 1 gives us a nice algebraic start, becuase if you factor the 3:
3x - 3y = 1
3(x-y) = 1
(x - y) = 1/3
You get that the difference is 1/3, which could be done via either:
2/3 - 1/3 (both positive ---> NO)
or
-1/3 - (-2/3) (both negative ---> YES)
Statement 2 is clearly not sufficient on its own. 1/2 satisfies statement 2 and gives a clear NO, but -1/-2 also works and gives the answer YES.
Taking them together, we still have the possibility for YES when we use:
x = -1/3 and y = -2/3, because -1/3 / -2/3 is 1/2.
Note that what statement 2 adds is that y must have a greater absolute value if they share the same sign, but that they can have different signs, too.
Perhaps the quickest way to show that they don't have to both be negative is to consider 0 (ever a gamechanging number). If x is 0 and y = -1/3, both statements are satisfied and the answer is NO, as 0 is neither negative nor positive.
____________________________________________________
I like this question as a demonstration of your job when picking numbers, which is to "prove insufficiency". The question wants you to see that two positives don't work, because in that case x is always the larger number (to satisfy statement 1) and that means that statement 2 is not satisfied. But you can have one negative and one positive (as ripulgupta had) or x zero and y negative, and then you don't have two negatives. The GMAT here thinks that you'll only try two positives when you're assessing choice C, realize that that doesn't work, and assume that they both have to be negative. But the creative folks win out here - those of us who try like crazy to get the opposite answer (NO, when YES may have come a bit easier) will win out.
____________________________
And to prodizy's comment about Chufus' post, whenever you see an inequality in a DS problem you should immediately have your senses heightened - there's a 90-some-% chance that the GMAT is setting you up for that "can't multiply/divide by a negative without changing the sign" rule. Their favorite way to do that is by making you multiply/divide a variable and not a known number; that way they can sneak that negative past you. If you see an inequality, immediately start thinking about the potential for variables to be negative!!!!!
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Clearly from stmt 1 (x-y =1/3) we cannot determine the signs of x and Y. INSUFFICIENTGmatKiss wrote:Are x and y both negative numbers?
(1) 3x - 3y = 1
(2) x/y < 1
Stmt 2 -- x/y < 1
Not this could either mean y>x or anything else (we still dont know the sign of X and Y )
-4/-5 (is still less than 1)
So, statement 2 is also not sufficient.
Combine the 2 statements.
x-y =1/3 and x/y<1
even if we take Y as negative, the solution to first equation can still be postive.
for example 2/3 -1/3 = 1/3 (where X =2/3 and Y = 1/3) or -1/3+2/3 = 1/3 (where x = -1/3 and Y = -2/3)
and in both cases. we have -2 <1 and 1/2 < 1 [Respectively]
therefore we still don't have any solution.
IMO OPTION E
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- GMAT Score:790
I posted a solution to a very similar problem here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/are-x-and-y- ... 89906.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/are-x-and-y- ... 89906.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
