BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Mixture problem

Expert replies
by vishwas.arora » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:24 am
Milk costs $7 per gallon and water costs $3 per gallon. A mixture contains 'x' gallons of milk and 'y' gallons of water. Is y>x?

(1) x>3
(2) The cost of the 5 gallons of the mixture is less than $30.

Any expert replies please.

OA after discussion.

Thanks
Jai Hind !
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:59 am
from the stem:

Cost of x+y gallons of mixture = 7x + 3y

(1) Clearly not enough

(2) We can have 5 gallons of mixture in a variety of combinations, but we also need to make sure that the cost is less than $30. For instance:

x = 5, y = 0, cost = 35 -> Not valid
x = 4, y = 1 , cost = 28 + 3 = 31 -> Not valid
x =3, y = 2, cost = 21+6 = 27 -> Valid
x =2 , y =3, cost = 14 + 9 = 23 -> Valid
x=1 , y=4 , cost = 7+12 = 19 -> Valid
x=0, y = 5, cost = 15 -> Valid

Clearly, the combination is valid for both y>x and y<x, so not sufficient

Combine (1) + (2)
We know that x > 3, but we also know that x can't be 4. So, lets put x = 3.5 and y = 1.5, total cost = 29. We can probably stretch the value of x and y a little more to get even closer to 30, but in each case, y will be less than x.

Hence, (C)

OA please?
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:06 am
This seems like a strange question.

Essentially, the statements are:
1. x > 3
2. x + y = 5

So the price really has nothing to do with answering the question.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by vishwas.arora » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:23 am
kmittal82 wrote:from the stem:

Cost of x+y gallons of mixture = 7x + 3y

(1) Clearly not enough

(2) We can have 5 gallons of mixture in a variety of combinations, but we also need to make sure that the cost is less than $30. For instance:

x = 5, y = 0, cost = 35 -> Not valid
x = 4, y = 1 , cost = 28 + 3 = 31 -> Not valid
x =3, y = 2, cost = 21+6 = 27 -> Valid
x =2 , y =3, cost = 14 + 9 = 23 -> Valid
x=1 , y=4 , cost = 7+12 = 19 -> Valid
x=0, y = 5, cost = 15 -> Valid

Clearly, the combination is valid for both y>x and y<x, so not sufficient

Combine (1) + (2)
We know that x > 3, but we also know that x can't be 4. So, lets put x = 3.5 and y = 1.5, total cost = 29. We can probably stretch the value of x and y a little more to get even closer to 30, but in each case, y will be less than x.

Hence, (C)

OA please?
Fine that alone both statements don't give the answer.
But while combining both (1) and (2), IMO we can't assume that x+y = 5. It is just stating that for certain 5 gallons of mixture the cost is less than $30.

OA is E
Jai Hind !
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:26 am
But while combining both (1) and (2), IMO we can't assume that x+y = 5. It is just stating that for certain 5 gallons of mixture the cost is less than $30.
I agree that the wording is ambiguous. It could go either way. The GMAT will not present that issue.
Just make sure you understand the result with each of the interpretations.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:31 am
IMO:E

1. x > 3 (Not sufficient)
2. x + y = 5 (Not sufficient)

1+2,

x can be (4,5,6,.....n)

Minimum possible combination:4(7)+1(3) = 31 -> violates condition (cost less than 30)
Not sufficient!
Join the discussion

by samir2562 » Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:06 pm
Any ideas why this is not C? If x+y=5, then knowing that x>3, it must be that x>y
Join the discussion

by samir2562 » Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:06 pm
Any ideas why this is not C? If x+y=5, then knowing that x>3, it must be that x>y
Join the discussion

by bpdulog » Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:57 am
Join the discussion

by rishimaharaj » Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:09 am
In my attempt I came up with the following table:

| x | y | $x | $y | $$ |
------------------------
| 0 | 5 | 00 | 15 | 15 |
| 1 | 4 | 07 | 12 | 19 |
| 2 | 3 | 14 | 09 | 23 |
| 3 | 2 | 21 | 06 | 27 |
| 4 | 1 | 28 | 03 | 31 |
| 5 | 0 | 35 | 00 | 35 |

Statement 1 gives no info on Y so it is insufficient.

Statement 2 says that the price is less than $30, which could mean:
(x,y) = (0,5) (1,4) (2,3) or (3,2).
In some cases Y > X and in others X > Y, so insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 together clash...
If x > 3, then x has to be either 4 or 5.
But this directly conflicts with Statement 2, where the cost is either $31 or $35.


Because of this, I'd go with answer choice E.
Join the discussion