Parallelogram Vs Rhombus Vs Square

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

Parallelogram Vs Rhombus Vs Square

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:37 pm
E, F, G, and H are the vertices of a polygon. Is polygon EFGH a square?

(1) EFGH is a parallelogram.

(2) The diagonals of EFGH are perpendicular bisectors of one another.

.....
I got confused with the properties even though i knew what each are individually. The relative properties between the 3 messed me around. Nice question though
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:11 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:E, F, G, and H are the vertices of a polygon. Is polygon EFGH a square?

(1) EFGH is a parallelogram.
(2) The diagonals of EFGH are perpendicular bisectors of one another.
To be a square a polygon must have four equal sides and four equal angles, i.e. four right angles.

Statement 1: EFGH may or may not be a square.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: As the diagonals of EFGH are perpendicular bisector of one another, EFGH must be a rhombus. A rhombus is a polygon with four equal sides and opposite sides are parallel to each other. But EFGH may or may not be a square.

Not sufficient

1& 2 Together: Both statements together do not add any new information as any rhombus is essentially a parallelogram.

Not sufficient

The correct answer is E.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:21 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by Anaira Mitch » Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:50 am
To prove that a quadrilateral is a square, you must prove that it is both a rhombus (all sides are equal) and a rectangle (all angles are equal).

(1) INSUFFICIENT: Not all parallelograms are squares (however all squares are parallelograms).

(2) INSUFFICIENT: If a quadrilateral has diagonals that are perpendicular bisectors of one another, that quadrilateral is a rhombus. Not all rhombuses are squares (however all squares are rhombuses).

If we look at the two statements together, they are still insufficient. Statement (2) tells us that ABCD is a rhombus, so statement one adds no more information (all rhombuses are parallelograms). To prove that a rhombus is a square, you need to know that one of its angles is a right angle or that its diagonals are equal (i.e. that it is also a rectangle).

The correct answer is E