BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

700 level CR problem

Expert replies
by mohit11 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:40 pm
Vocational centers sponsored by federal programs have proven to be ineffective, unsuccessful, and too costly, and should be discontinued. These programs, designed for disadvantaged young people aged 16-20 and entering the workforce, have been administered in nearly all 50 states. The main goal of these programs is to train and place young men and women in primarily blue-collar and clerical positions

Which of the following, if true, most forcefully undermines the conclusion above?

A) A large percentage of the graduates of these vocational centers have ended up in jail or on welfare.

B) The federal government has an obligation to aid impoverished, uneducated, and disadvantaged people in our society.

C) The cost per person in these centers is less per year than for a federal prisoner or welfare recipient, and the skills learned are valuable for many professions.

D) Training young people for blue-collar positions is more costly than providing free tuition for them at state universities for four years.

E) These same government programs should be made available to all young people regardless of economic status




OA C

Please cite reasons for choosing/rejecting each answer choice and please do not see the OA before you're done answering.

Source: BTG questions
Last edited by mohit11 on Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of Consulting Network: https://consultingnetwork.co.in - A portal for consultants

Facebook Page for Consulting Network: https://www.facebook.com/globalconsultingnetwork

My Blog: https://outspoken-mind.blocked

730 Debrief: https://www.beatthegmat.com/730-q49-v41- ... 80010.html
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by reply2spg » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:54 pm
Where is the question here?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by gmat1011 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:46 pm
No question here? And B,C and D,E look identical
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:40 pm
Mohit bhai...
Sawal to likho!!
:)
Join the discussion

by mohit11 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:12 pm
adi_800 wrote:Mohit bhai...
Sawal to likho!!
:)
oops. - Edited the post :)
Founder of Consulting Network: https://consultingnetwork.co.in - A portal for consultants

Facebook Page for Consulting Network: https://www.facebook.com/globalconsultingnetwork

My Blog: https://outspoken-mind.blocked

730 Debrief: https://www.beatthegmat.com/730-q49-v41- ... 80010.html
Join the discussion

by gmat1011 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:34 pm
I would have thought B

C) The cost per person in these centers is less per year than for a federal prisoner or welfare recipient, and the skills learned are valuable for many professions.

While C weakens the conclusion (which is that the prog needs to be discontinued), it draws a comparison of these disadvantaged people with "prisoners" and "welfare recipients" in a very stereotypical and offensive way...

There seems nothing in the passage to warrant this comparison, while the answer seems to be based on this comparison to say that look at least the vocational prog is cheaper than handling these people in jail or giving them welfare... and these scum also pick up additional skills to boot!

Why should we think that way?
Join the discussion

by mohit11 » Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:01 am
gmat1011 wrote:I would have thought B

C) The cost per person in these centers is less per year than for a federal prisoner or welfare recipient, and the skills learned are valuable for many professions.

While C weakens the conclusion (which is that the prog needs to be discontinued), it draws a comparison of these disadvantaged people with "prisoners" and "welfare recipients" in a very stereotypical and offensive way...

There seems nothing in the passage to warrant this comparison, while the answer seems to be based on this comparison to say that look at least the vocational prog is cheaper than handling these people in jail or giving them welfare... and these scum also pick up additional skills to boot!

Why should we think that way?
That's what i thought, some of these BTG questions are weird.
Founder of Consulting Network: https://consultingnetwork.co.in - A portal for consultants

Facebook Page for Consulting Network: https://www.facebook.com/globalconsultingnetwork

My Blog: https://outspoken-mind.blocked

730 Debrief: https://www.beatthegmat.com/730-q49-v41- ... 80010.html
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Sun Sep 19, 2010 8:11 pm
mohit11 wrote:
gmat1011 wrote:I would have thought B

C) The cost per person in these centers is less per year than for a federal prisoner or welfare recipient, and the skills learned are valuable for many professions.

While C weakens the conclusion (which is that the prog needs to be discontinued), it draws a comparison of these disadvantaged people with "prisoners" and "welfare recipients" in a very stereotypical and offensive way...

There seems nothing in the passage to warrant this comparison, while the answer seems to be based on this comparison to say that look at least the vocational prog is cheaper than handling these people in jail or giving them welfare... and these scum also pick up additional skills to boot!

Why should we think that way?
That's what i thought, some of these BTG questions are weird.
'C' weakens the conclusion best by touching upon the cost factor. None of the other choices weaken the conclusion at all. 'B' only talks about obligation but does not talks about the effectiveness of the program or about the cost. Choose 'C'.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:48 pm
Conclusion : Vocational centers sponsored by federal programs have proven to be ineffective, unsuccessful, and too costly, and should be discontinued

C undermines the conclusion by hitting cost factor.

It also mentioned that skills learned are valuable for many professions. This makes program effective and successful.
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion