BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Equation Qs

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sam2304 » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:48 pm
How can you come up with the value of x using statement 2 ? Or am i missing something here ?

is xy = -1 ?

we cannot substitute y = 1 in xy = -1 and say x = -1. xy can be = 4 or 8 or -12. You can substitute only if it is given as 'if xy = -1'.

A.x = y => is xy = -1 ? No. SUFF.
B.y = 1 => is xy = -1 ? We don't have value of x so INSUFF.

IMO A.

Hope i am right :)
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Nov 28, 2011 8:53 pm
Strongt wrote:is xy = -1?

1) x=y
2) y=1

Answer is A

and I understand why, but looking at statement 2, I can come up with a value for x
(1) x = y implies that xy cannot be equal to -1, because for their product to be -1, one of them should be positive and other should be negative, which cannot be the case as x = y. So, statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question asked.

(2)y = 1 implies x * (1) = -1, which implies x = -1. So xy = -1, which is again sufficient to answer the given question.

But there is a contradiction in this question, 1st statement says x = y and the 2nd one says x is not equal to y, so the answer to the main question changes. But this cannot be the case in a good GMAT question.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Strongt » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:56 pm
sam2304 wrote:How can you come up with the value of x using statement 2 ? Or am i missing something here ?

is xy = -1 ?

we cannot substitute y = 1 in xy = -1 and say x = -1. xy can be = 4 or 8 or -12. You can substitute only if it is given as 'if xy = -1'.

A.x = y => is xy = -1 ? No. SUFF.
B.y = 1 => is xy = -1 ? We don't have value of x so INSUFF.

IMO A.

Hope i am right :)
You're right :)

But I thougth we could substitute y in xy = -1. I guess we can't
Join the discussion

by Strongt » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:58 pm
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
Strongt wrote:is xy = -1?

1) x=y
2) y=1

Answer is A

and I understand why, but looking at statement 2, I can come up with a value for x
(1) x = y implies that xy cannot be equal to -1, because for their product to be -1, one of them should be positive and other should be negative, which cannot be the case as x = y. So, statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question asked.

(2)y = 1 implies x * (1) = -1, which implies x = -1. So xy = -1, which is again sufficient to answer the given question.

But there is a contradiction in this question, 1st statement says x = y and the 2nd one says x is not equal to y, so the answer to the main question changes. But this cannot be the case in a good GMAT question.
I also noticed that!

Question is from Manhattan GMAT (Guide 3)
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Nov 29, 2011 7:45 am
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
Strongt wrote:is xy = -1?

1) x=y
2) y=1

(2)y = 1 implies x * (1) = -1, which implies x = -1. So xy = -1, which is again sufficient to answer the given question.

You're using the question here as though it were a fact. The question *asks* if xy = -1. We don't know if that's true, so we can't use it to draw any conclusions. Of course, if we assume that xy = -1 is true, then obviously we'll find out that xy = -1 is true - that's the "begging the question" fallacy in logic.

When we look at Statement 2 here, we have exactly one fact that we can use: y = 1. Since we know nothing else, we have no idea if xy = -1 is true. If x = -1, then indeed xy = -1. If x is anything else, then xy will not equal -1. So Statement 2 is not sufficient.

Statement 1 is sufficient, since if x = y, the answer to the question must be 'no'. But if you did try to consider both Statements together, the Statements here are in no way contradictory. Using both Statements, we know that x and y are both equal to 1. There's no contradiction there.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion